Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jan;27(1):3-12.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-009-9359-x. Epub 2009 Dec 12.

Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes

Affiliations
Review

Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes

Ryan T Schulte et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Male factor infertility is the sole cause of infertility in approximately 20% of infertile couples, with an additional 30% to 40% secondary to both male and female factors. Current means of evaluation of male factor infertility remains routine semen analysis including seminal volume, pH, sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. However, approximately 15% of patients with male factor infertility have a normal semen analysis and a definitive diagnosis of male infertility often cannot be made as a result of routine semen analysis. Attention has focused on the role of sperm nuclear DNA integrity in male factor infertility. Here we review the structure of human sperm chromatin, the etiology and mechanisms of sperm DNA damage, current tests available to assess sperm DNA integrity, and effect of sperm DNA integrity on reproductive outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sperm DNA fragmentation assays. A. TUNEL assay. Blue sperm are TUNEL negative while green sperm are TUNEL positive indicating DNA fragmentation. B. Sperm Chromatin Dispersion Test. The two sperm in the center with non-fragmented DNA form large halos, while the sperm in the upper right hand corner has no halo indicating DNA fragmentation. Results from both assays are typically expressed as percentage of sperm demonstrating DNA fragmentation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agarwal A, Allamaneni SS. Sperm DNA damage assessment: a test whose time has come. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:850–853. - PubMed
    1. Aitken RJ, Bowie H, Buckingham D, Harkiss D, Richardson DW, West KM. Sperm penetration into a hyaluronic acid polymer as a means of monitoring functional competence. J Androl. 1992;13:44–54. - PubMed
    1. Aitken RJ, Krausz C. Oxidative stress, DNA damage and the Y chromosome. Reproduction. 2001;122:497–506. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez C, Castilla JA, Martinez L, Ramirez JP, Vergara F, Gaforio JJ. Biological variation of seminal parameters in healthy subjects. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2082–2088. - PubMed
    1. Alvarez JG, Sharma RK, Ollero M, Saleh RA, Lopez MC, Thomas AJ, Jr, et al. Increased DNA damage in sperm from leukocytospermic semen samples as determined by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:319–329. - PubMed