Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar;13(1):1-45.
doi: 10.1007/s10567-009-0060-5.

Family support in children's mental health: a review and synthesis

Affiliations
Review

Family support in children's mental health: a review and synthesis

Kimberly E Hoagwood et al. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

A comprehensive review of structured family support programs in children's mental health was conducted in collaboration with leadership from key national family organizations. The goals were to identify typologies of family support services for which evaluation data existed and identify research gaps. Over 200 programs were examined; 50 met criteria for inclusion. Programs were categorized by whether they were delivered by peer family members, clinicians, or teams. Five salient components of family support were identified: (a) informational, (b) instructional, (c) emotional, (d) instrumental, and (e) advocacy. Clinician-led programs were heavily represented (n = 33, 66%), followed by family-led (n = 11, 22%), and team-delivered (n = 6, 12%) programs. Key differences between programs delivered by clinicians or by peer family members were found in the degree of emphasis, research methodology, and outcomes. However, the content of the components was similar across all three program types. There are both important differences in emphasis across typologies of family support provided by clinicians, family members, or teams as well as important similarities in content. Family-delivered support may be an important adjunct to existing services for parents, although the research base remains thin. A research agenda to promote more rigorous evaluations of these services especially those delivered by peer family members is critical.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am Psychol. 2000 Feb;55(2):205-17 - PubMed
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Apr;76(2):282-97 - PubMed
    1. Community Ment Health J. 2005 Feb;41(1):51-66 - PubMed
    1. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;39(3):365-76 - PubMed
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Jun;71(3):504-15 - PubMed

Publication types