Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format
- PMID: 20013461
- DOI: 10.1080/02640410903348665
Movement patterns in cricket vary by both position and game format
Abstract
We compared the movement patterns of cricketers in different playing positions across three formats of cricket (Twenty20, One Day, multi-day matches). Cricket Australia Centre of Excellence cricketers (n = 42) from five positions (batting, fast bowling, spin bowling, wicketkeeping, and fielding) had their movement patterns (walk, jog, run, stride, and sprint) quantified by global positioning system (GPS) technology over two seasons. Marked differences in movement patterns were evident between positions and game formats, with fast bowlers undertaking the greatest workload of any position in cricket. Fast bowlers sprinted twice as often, covered over three times the distance sprinting, with much smaller work-to-recovery ratios than other positions. Fast bowlers during multi-day matches covered 22.6 +/- 4.0 km (mean +/- s) total distance in a day (1.4 +/- 0.9 km in sprinting). In comparison, wicketkeepers rarely sprinted, despite still covering a daily total distance of 16.6 +/- 2.1 km. Overall, One Day and Twenty20 cricket required approximately 50 to 100% more sprinting per hour than multi-day matches. However, multi-day cricket's longer duration resulted in 16-130% more sprinting per day. In summary, the shorter formats (Twenty20 and One Day) are more intensive per unit of time, but multi-day cricket has a greater overall physical load.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of player movement patterns between 1-day and test cricket.J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1368-73. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181da7899. J Strength Cond Res. 2011. PMID: 21273907
-
Movement patterns and physical strain during a novel, simulated cricket batting innings (BATEX).J Sports Sci. 2011 May;29(8):801-9. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2011.560174. J Sports Sci. 2011. PMID: 21506040
-
Comparison of training and game demands of national level cricketers.J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1306-11. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d82cfd. J Strength Cond Res. 2011. PMID: 21273915
-
A Review of the Internal and External Physiological Demands Associated With Batting in Cricket.Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Nov;11(8):987-997. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0169. Epub 2016 Aug 24. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016. PMID: 27248509 Review.
-
Do Fast Bowlers Fatigue in Cricket? A Paradox Between Player Anecdotes and Quantitative Evidence.Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Jul;12(6):719-727. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0389. Epub 2016 Dec 14. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017. PMID: 27967283 Review.
Cited by
-
The physical profile of female cricketers: An investigation between playing standard and position.PLoS One. 2024 Jun 10;19(6):e0302647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302647. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38857238 Free PMC article.
-
Injury incidence within male elite New Zealand cricket from the early T20 era: 2009-2015.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021 Nov 19;7(4):e001168. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001168. eCollection 2021. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2021. PMID: 34868632 Free PMC article.
-
Train Like You Compete? Physical and Physiological Responses on Semi-Professional Soccer Players.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 24;17(3):756. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030756. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 31991632 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification of the demands of cricket bowling and the relationship to injury risk: a systematic review.BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Sep 10;13(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00335-8. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 34507613 Free PMC article.
-
Physical profiling of international cricket players: an investigation between bowlers and batters.Biol Sport. 2021 Oct;38(4):507-515. doi: 10.5114/biolsport.2021.100148. Epub 2020 Dec 30. Biol Sport. 2021. PMID: 34937959 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical