Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Dec 21;15(47):5983-91.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5983.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Hai-Lin Jin et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery with surgery alone for resectable esophageal carcinoma.

Methods: We used MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify eligible studies and manual searches were done to ensure no studies were missed. Trial validity assessment was performed and a trial quality score was assigned.

Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 1308 patients were selected. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly improved the overall survival compared with surgery alone. Odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI), P value], expressed as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery vs surgery alone, was 1.28 (1.01-1.64, P = 0.05) for 1-year survival, 1.78 (1.20-2.66, P = 0.004) for 3-year survival, and 1.46 (1.07-1.99, P = 0.02) for 5-year survival. Postoperative mortality increased in patients treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.03-2.73, P = 0.04), but incidence of postoperative complications was similar in two groups (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 0.88-1.49, P = 0.32). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy lowered the local-regional cancer recurrence (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-0.99, P = 0.04), but incidence of distant cancer recurrence was similar (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.68-1.31, P = 0.73). Histological subgroup analysis indicated that esophageal squamous cell carcinoma did not benefit from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, OR (95% CI, P value) was 1.16 (0.85-1.57, P = 0.34) for 1-year survival, 1.34 (0.98-1.82, P = 0.07) for 3-year survival and 1.41 (0.98-2.02, P = 0.06) for 5-year survival.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can raise the survival rate of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Keywords: Esophageal carcinoma; Meta-analysis; Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; Randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Postoperative survival rate in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery compared with surgery alone. A: One-year survival; B: Three-year survival; C: Five-year survival. CRT + S: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery; S: Surgery; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2
R0 resection rate in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery compared with surgery alone.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Postoperative mortality in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery compared with surgery alone.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Incidence of postoperative complication in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery compared with surgery alone.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cancer recurrence after surgery in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery compared with surgery alone. A: Incidence of local-regional cancer recurrence; B: Incidence of distant cancer recurrence.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM, Muir CS. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Comparability and quality of data. IARC Sci Publ. 1992:45–173. - PubMed
    1. Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of upper gastrointestinal malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2004;31:450–464. - PubMed
    1. Khushalani N. Cancer of the esophagus and stomach. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:712–722. - PubMed
    1. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–1900. - PubMed

Publication types