Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition
- PMID: 20016188
- DOI: 10.1159/000265012
Ultrasound experience substantially impacts on diagnostic performance and confidence when adnexal masses are classified using pattern recognition
Abstract
Aim: To determine how accurately and confidently examiners with different levels of ultrasound experience can classify adnexal masses as benign or malignant and suggest a specific histological diagnosis when evaluating ultrasound images using pattern recognition.
Methods: Ultrasound images of selected adnexal masses were evaluated by 3 expert sonologists, 2 senior and 4 junior trainees. They were instructed to classify the masses using pattern recognition as benign or malignant, to state the level of confidence with which this classification was made and to suggest a specific histological diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) with regard to malignancy were calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of pattern recognition was calculated by using six levels of diagnostic confidence.
Results: 166 masses were examined, of which 42% were malignant. Sensitivity with regard to malignancy ranged from 80 to 86% for the experts, was 70 and 84% for the 2 senior trainees and ranged from 70 to 86% for the junior trainees. The specificity of the experts ranged from 79 to 91%, was 77 and 89% for the senior trainees and ranged from 59 to 83% for the junior trainees. The experts were uncertain about their diagnosis in 4-13% of the cases, the senior trainees in 15-20% and the junior trainees in 67-100% of the cases. The AUCs ranged from 0.861 to 0.922 for the experts, were 0.842 and 0.855 for the senior trainees, and ranged from 0.726 to 0.795 for the junior trainees. The experts suggested a correct specific histological diagnosis in 69-77% of the cases. All 6 trainees did so significantly less often (22-42% of the cases).
Conclusion: Expert sonologists can accurately classify adnexal masses as benign or malignant and can successfully predict the specific histological diagnosis in many cases. Whilst less experienced operators perform reasonably well when predicting the benign or malignant nature of the mass, they do so with a very low level of diagnostic confidence and are unable to state the likely histology of a mass in most cases.
Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound methods to distinguish between malignant and benign adnexal masses in the hands of examiners with different levels of experience.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;34(4):454-61. doi: 10.1002/uog.6443. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19736644
-
Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):456-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.9030. Epub 2011 Sep 13. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21520475
-
Improving the preoperative classification of adnexal masses as benign or malignant by second-stage tests.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):100-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.8813. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 20814878
-
Use of morphology to characterize and manage common adnexal masses.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Feb;18(1):71-89. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2003.10.002. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004. PMID: 15123059 Review.
-
[Sonographic diagnosis of presumed benign ovarian tumors].J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013 Dec;42(8):730-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Nov 5. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2013. PMID: 24200073 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 27;14(13):3151. doi: 10.3390/cancers14133151. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35804924 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnosis of Ovarian Neoplasms Using Nomogram in Combination With Ultrasound Image-Based Radiomics Signature and Clinical Factors.Front Genet. 2021 Sep 28;12:753948. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.753948. eCollection 2021. Front Genet. 2021. PMID: 34650603 Free PMC article.
-
GI-RADS versus O-RADS in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: a systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis.Ultrasonography. 2024 Nov;43(6):438-447. doi: 10.14366/usg.24105. Epub 2024 Sep 2. Ultrasonography. 2024. PMID: 39415417 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI.Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022 Oct 1;21(4):599-607. doi: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0003. Epub 2021 Sep 3. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022. PMID: 34483226 Free PMC article.
-
Association between the sonographer's experience and diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules.World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep 5;16(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1479-2. World J Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30185198 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical