Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 17:2:69.
doi: 10.1186/1755-8794-2-69.

A taxonomy of epithelial human cancer and their metastases

Affiliations

A taxonomy of epithelial human cancer and their metastases

Olivier Gevaert et al. BMC Med Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Microarray technology has allowed to molecularly characterize many different cancer sites. This technology has the potential to individualize therapy and to discover new drug targets. However, due to technological differences and issues in standardized sample collection no study has evaluated the molecular profile of epithelial human cancer in a large number of samples and tissues. Additionally, it has not yet been extensively investigated whether metastases resemble their tissue of origin or tissue of destination.

Methods: We studied the expression profiles of a series of 1566 primary and 178 metastases by unsupervised hierarchical clustering. The clustering profile was subsequently investigated and correlated with clinico-pathological data. Statistical enrichment of clinico-pathological annotations of groups of samples was investigated using Fisher exact test. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and DAVID functional enrichment analysis were used to investigate the molecular pathways. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were used to investigate prognostic significance of gene signatures.

Results: Large clusters corresponding to breast, gastrointestinal, ovarian and kidney primary tissues emerged from the data. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma clustered together with follicular differentiated thyroid carcinoma, which supports recent morphological descriptions of thyroid follicular carcinoma-like tumors in the kidney and suggests that they represent a subtype of chromophobe carcinoma. We also found an expression signature identifying primary tumors of squamous cell histology in multiple tissues. Next, a subset of ovarian tumors enriched with endometrioid histology clustered together with endometrium tumors, confirming that they share their etiopathogenesis, which strongly differs from serous ovarian tumors. In addition, the clustering of colon and breast tumors correlated with clinico-pathological characteristics. Moreover, a signature was developed based on our unsupervised clustering of breast tumors and this was predictive for disease-specific survival in three independent studies. Next, the metastases from ovarian, breast, lung and vulva cluster with their tissue of origin while metastases from colon showed a bimodal distribution. A significant part clusters with tissue of origin while the remaining tumors cluster with the tissue of destination.

Conclusion: Our molecular taxonomy of epithelial human cancer indicates surprising correlations over tissues. This may have a significant impact on the classification of many cancer sites and may guide pathologists, both in research and daily practice. Moreover, these results based on unsupervised analysis yielded a signature predictive of clinical outcome in breast cancer. Additionally, we hypothesize that metastases from gastrointestinal origin either remember their tissue of origin or adapt to the tissue of destination. More specifically, colon metastases in the liver show strong evidence for such a bimodal tissue specific profile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Hierarchical clustering of 1566 primary epithelial human cancer tumors and 178 metastatic tumors of epithelial origin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cluster composition for the primary tumor samples. The total number of primary samples in each cluster is indicated.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cluster composition for the metastatic tumor samples according to their primary site. The total number of metastases samples in each cluster is indicated.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kidney subclustering.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Breast subclustering.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Investigation of the prognostic relationship of the breast clustering signature in three external data sets with 1 = good prognosis group and 2 = poor prognosis group.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Colon subclustering.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Clustering with intrinsic genes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chung CH, Bernard PS, Perou CM. Molecular portraits and the family tree of cancer. Nat Genet. 2002;32(Suppl):533–540. doi: 10.1038/ng1038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science. 1999;286:531–537. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.531. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weigelt B, Hu ZY, He XP, Livasy C, Carey LA, Ewend MG. Molecular portraits and 70-gene prognosis signature are preserved throughout the metastatic process of breast cancer. Cancer research. 2005;65:9155–9158. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2553. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8418–8423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0932692100. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hayes DN, Monti S, Parmigiani G, Gilks CB, Naoki K, Bhattacharjee A. Gene expression profiling reveals reproducible human lung adenocarcinoma subtypes in multiple independent patient cohorts. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2006;24:5079–5090. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1748. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources