Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2010 May;31(5):912-8.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1932. Epub 2009 Dec 17.

A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A prospective trial of 3T and 1.5T time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms

T J Kaufmann et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 May.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Endovascularly coiled intracranial aneurysms are increasingly being followed up with noninvasive MRA imaging to evaluate for aneurysm recurrences. It has not been well-established which MRA techniques are best for this application, however. Our aim was to prospectively compare 4 MRA techniques, TOF and CE-MRA at 1.5T and 3T, to a reference standard of DSA in the evaluation of previously endovascularly coiled intracranial aneurysms.

Materials and methods: Fifty-eight subjects with 63 previously coiled intracranial aneurysms underwent all 4 MRA techniques within 8 days of DSA. There were 2 outcome variables: coil occlusion class (class 1, complete; class 2, dog ear; class 3, residual neck; class 4, aneurysm filling) and change in degree of occlusion since the previous comparison. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each MRA technique relative to the reference standard of DSA. Differences among the MRA techniques were evaluated in pair-wise fashion by using the McNemar test.

Results: For the detection of any aneurysm remnant, the sensitivity was 85%-90% for all MRA techniques. Sensitivity dropped to 50%-67% when calculated for the detection of only the class 3 and 4 aneurysm remnants, because several class 3 and 4 remnants were misclassified as class 2 by MRA. CE-MRA at 1.5T and 3T misclassified fewer of the class 3 and 4 remnants than did TOF-MRA at 1.5T, as reflected by the significantly greater sensitivity for larger aneurysm remnants with CE-MRA relative to TOF-MRA at 1.5T (P = .0455 for both comparisons).

Conclusions: CE-MRA is more likely than TOF-MRA to classify larger aneurysm remnants appropriately. We recommend performing both CE-MRA and TOF-MRA in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms and at 3T if available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
MRA technique sensitivity for any aneurysm remnant, larger (class 3 or 4) remnants, and the detection of growth since previous DSA; 95% confidence intervals are shown.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
MRA technique specificity for any aneurysm remnant, larger (class 3 or 4) remnants, and the detection of growth since previous DSA; 95% confidence intervals are shown.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
DSA (A), 3T TOF-MRA MIP (B), 3T CE-MRA MIP (C), 3T TOF-MRA source image (D), and 3T CE-MRA source image (E). A class 4 coiled anterior communicating artery remnant/recurrence (white arrows in A, B, and C) is better depicted as a large remnant with CE-MRA (C) than with TOF-MRA (B). Digitally subtracted coils are seen in A (black arrows). However, by using our clinical scanning protocols, localization of the coil mass is improved with TOF-MRA (D, white arrow) relative to CE-MRA (E). This may be related to better visualization of the surrounding brain tissue with TOF than with CE-MRA because of a shorter TR and higher flip angle of the CE-MRA and a longer TE with TOF-MRA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. . International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267–74 - PubMed
    1. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, et al. . Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms. Part I. MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1001–08 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Renowden SA, Benes V, Bradley M, et al. . Detachable coil embolisation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a single center study, a decade experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2009;111:179–88. Epub 2008 Nov 13 - PubMed
    1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. . International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–17 - PubMed
    1. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J, 3rd, Mandrekar JN, et al. . Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812–19 - PubMed

Publication types