Effect of filler content of flowable composites on resin-cavity interface
- PMID: 20019418
- DOI: 10.4012/dmj.28.679
Effect of filler content of flowable composites on resin-cavity interface
Abstract
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate marginal integrity and wall adaptation in 1- and 2-mm-deep cavities restored with a high filler-loaded flowable composite in comparison to a flowable composite with lower filler content and a conventional hybrid composite. 1-mm-deep dentin and 2-mm-deep enamel-dentin Class I cavities were prepared and restored with a self-etch adhesive and with one of the composites. Samples were crosscut and evaluated for marginal integrity and gap formation using a digital microscope. Selected samples were also observed using a scanning electron microscope. For 1-mm-deep cavities, no differences in marginal integrity and wall adaptation were observed among the three composites. For 2-mm-deep cavities, those restored with the bulk technique and with the higher filler-loaded flowable composite demonstrated a similar outcome as that of the conventional hybrid composite. On the effect of restorative techniques, cohesive enamel defects were observed in bulk-filled 2-mm-deep cavities. However, when the incremental technique was used in conjunction with the higher filler-loaded flowable composite and the conventional hybrid composite for 2-mm-deep cavities, superior results were obtained.
Similar articles
-
Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.Dent Mater. 2006 Mar;22(3):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.011. Epub 2005 Aug 9. Dent Mater. 2006. PMID: 16084584 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Mar 11. J Dent. 2014. PMID: 24631232
-
The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):70-5. Oper Dent. 2001. PMID: 11203780 Clinical Trial.
-
Marginal integrity of flowable and packable bulk fill materials used for class II restorations -A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.Dent Mater J. 2020 Jun 5;39(3):335-344. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2018-180. Epub 2020 Jan 11. Dent Mater J. 2020. PMID: 31932546
-
Micromechanical interlocking structure at the filler/resin interface for dental composites: a review.Int J Oral Sci. 2023 May 31;15(1):21. doi: 10.1038/s41368-023-00226-3. Int J Oral Sci. 2023. PMID: 37258568 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of self-adhering flowable composite microleakage with several types of bonding agent in class V cavity restoration.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Jul-Aug;16(4):257-263. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019. PMID: 31303881 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical Behavior of Repaired Monolithic Crowns: A 3D Finite Element Analysis.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Oct 31;11(11):254. doi: 10.3390/dj11110254. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37999018 Free PMC article.
-
Microleakage of silorane- and methacrylate-based class V composite restorations.Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0619-7. Epub 2011 Sep 27. Clin Oral Investig. 2012. PMID: 21947906
-
Randomized controlled clinical trial of a highly filled flowable composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 3-year results.Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5955-5965. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03901-z. Epub 2021 Apr 2. Clin Oral Investig. 2021. PMID: 33797635 Clinical Trial.
-
Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin.Eur J Dent. 2014 Jan;8(1):1-8. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126230. Eur J Dent. 2014. PMID: 24966739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous