Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;3(6 Suppl 4):S180-3.
doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1192.

Screening for bladder cancer: the best opportunity to reduce mortality

Affiliations

Screening for bladder cancer: the best opportunity to reduce mortality

Yves Fradet. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Bladder cancer kills more women than cervical cancer and is also a significant cause of mortality in men. Little progress has been made in improving survival in patients with advanced bladder cancer. Two pilot studies using microhematuria screening have shown that screening for bladder cancer results in close to 80% downstaging, with high-grade cancers being detected before they have invaded the bladder wall. Results of long-term follow-up even suggest a striking reduction in bladder cancer mortality. The main obstacles to screening for bladder cancer may be overcome if a higher-risk population is identified by designing a risk scale for exposure to cigarette smoke and occupational carcinogens, and through genetic testing for susceptibility to cancer and home hematuria screening, which in itself identifies a population with approximately 3% to 4% risk of bladder cancer. The feasibility and cost effectiveness of screening for bladder cancer can be significantly improved by incorporating a secondary screening strategy using a more sensitive and specific bladder cancer marker that is currently available, and by limiting urological evaluations to patients who show positive results on one or more of these tests. Bladder cancer is the most costly cancer to treat in the United States and pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that screening for bladder cancer could not only save lives but also reduce costs per year-life saved. A pilot study is underway and the urology community should be very supportive of studies to validate this opportunity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nieder AM, Lotan Y, Nuss GR, et al. Are patients with hematuria appropriately referred to Urology? A multi-institutional questionnaire based survey 2009. In press. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10–30. - PubMed
    1. Silverman DT, Hartge P, Morrison AS, et al. Epidemiology of bladder cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1992;6:1–30. - PubMed
    1. Vaidya A, Soloway M, Hawke C, et al. De novo muscle invasive bladder cancer: is there a change in trend J Urol 200116547–50.discussion 50. - PubMed
    1. Marshall VF. Current clinical problems regarding bladder tumors. Cancer. 1956;9:543–50. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources