Fixation behavior in advanced stage glaucoma assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1
- PMID: 20020235
- DOI: 10.1007/s10384-009-0735-y
Fixation behavior in advanced stage glaucoma assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate fixation behavior in eyes with advanced glaucoma using the MicroPerimeter MP-1.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 39 glaucoma patients who had scotomas adjacent to fixation points. Using the MP-1, we examined the stability and location of fixation with the fixation test and the microperimetry test. We examined retinal sensitivity using the central 10-2 SITA standard programs of a Humphrey Field Analyzer and the macula 10 degrees program of the MP-1 and analyzed the correlation between fixation behavior and retinal sensitivity.
Results: Of the 39 eyes, 37 showed "stable" fixation in the fixation test, while 30 eyes showed stable fixation in the microperimetry test. In the fixation test, 32 of 39 eyes demonstrated "predominantly central" fixation, whereas in the microperimetry test only 26 eyes exhibited the same fixation. Fixation stability correlated positively with sensitivity in the central 10 degrees diameter area (r=0.414, P=0.009). Among the six eyes showing "predominantly eccentric" fixation, the preferred retinal locus of five was in the superior or superotemporal direction from the fovea.
Conclusions: The MP-1 illustrated the fixation patterns in glaucomatous eyes and the fixation patterns correlated well with retinal sensitivity.
Similar articles
-
Fixation behavior in primary open angle glaucoma at early and moderate stage assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1.J Glaucoma. 2013 Feb;22(2):169-73. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182311dce. J Glaucoma. 2013. PMID: 21946547
-
A microperimeter that provides fixation pattern and retinal sensitivity measurement.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar-Apr;50(2):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s10384-005-0292-y. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 16604385
-
Efficacy of SLO-Microperimetry and Humphrey for evaluating macular sensitivity changes in advanced glaucoma.Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;48(5):406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2013.08.001. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 24093188
-
Microperimetry and clinical practice: an evidence-based review.Can J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;48(5):350-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Oct 23. Can J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 24093179 Review.
-
Microperimetry in Three Inherited Retinal Disorders.Semin Ophthalmol. 2019;34(4):334-339. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2019.1622025. Epub 2019 May 30. Semin Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31146612 Review.
Cited by
-
Fascicular Visual Field Defects in Open-Angle Glaucoma: Evaluation with Microperimetry.J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:8274954. doi: 10.1155/2016/8274954. Epub 2016 Jun 5. J Ophthalmol. 2016. PMID: 27366329 Free PMC article.
-
Use of microperimetry to compare macular light sensitivity in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;56(2):138-44. doi: 10.1007/s10384-011-0111-6. Epub 2011 Dec 10. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22160406
-
Eye movements during visual search in patients with glaucoma.BMC Ophthalmol. 2012 Aug 31;12:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-12-45. BMC Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22937814 Free PMC article.
-
Microperimetry and optical coherence tomography imaging in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral focal ischaemic glaucoma.Eye (Lond). 2018 Aug;32(8):1372-1379. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0094-3. Epub 2018 Apr 30. Eye (Lond). 2018. PMID: 29706619 Free PMC article.
-
Smaller Fixation Target Size Is Associated with More Stable Fixation and Less Variance in Threshold Sensitivity.PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0165046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165046. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27829030 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical