Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems
- PMID: 20022127
- DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.11.014
Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the system time lag associated with subcutaneous interstitial glucose (IG) sensing and venous blood glucose (BG) of two continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, the SEVEN((R)) (DexCom, San Diego, CA) and the Navigator((R)) (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA), in adults with type 1 diabetes.
Methods: Fourteen subjects wore both CGM systems concurrently during the 15-day study. Reference YSI (Yellow Springs, OH) and CGM data from the in-clinic sessions, conducted on day 5, 10 and 15 of the study were evaluated. The system time lag of CGM system was estimated using various regression method related statistical estimators.
Results: The estimated time lags based on different statistical measures are similar within each CGM system. The time lag based on correlation coefficient criteria is estimated as 4.5+/-5min (median+/-IQR) for the SEVEN((R)), and 15+/-7min for the Navigator((R)). The ranges of these estimators of two CGM systems were different (2-6min for SEVEN((R)) and 14-15min for Navigator((R))).
Conclusions: The study findings suggest that commonly accessible statistics, such as correlation statistics, offer estimates that are comparable to complicated approaches. Different time lags were observed with two CGM systems.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00939289.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Feb;11(2):65-72. doi: 10.1089/dia.2008.0109. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009. PMID: 19243265
-
New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Dec;11(12):749-55. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0075. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009. PMID: 20001675 Clinical Trial.
-
Analytical methods for the retrieval and interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data in diabetes.Methods Enzymol. 2009;454:69-86. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03803-2. Methods Enzymol. 2009. PMID: 19216923
-
[Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnancies complicated by diabetes].Ugeskr Laeger. 2011 Jun 6;173(23):1640-5. Ugeskr Laeger. 2011. PMID: 21645482 Review. Danish.
-
Continuous glucose monitoring.Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2010 Feb;(166):11-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02272.x. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2010. PMID: 20377658 Review.
Cited by
-
Design, development, and evaluation of a novel microneedle array-based continuous glucose monitor.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 May;8(3):483-7. doi: 10.1177/1932296814526191. Epub 2014 Mar 6. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014. PMID: 24876610 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Combining information of autonomic modulation and CGM measurements enables prediction and improves detection of spontaneous hypoglycemic events.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Jan;9(1):132-7. doi: 10.1177/1932296814549830. Epub 2014 Sep 12. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015. PMID: 25216731 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
An In-Ear PPG-Based Blood Glucose Monitor: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;23(6):3319. doi: 10.3390/s23063319. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36992029 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo analytical performance of nitric oxide-releasing glucose biosensors.Anal Chem. 2014 Jul 15;86(14):7141-9. doi: 10.1021/ac5017425. Epub 2014 Jul 1. Anal Chem. 2014. PMID: 24984031 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous glucose monitoring considerations for the development of a closed-loop artificial pancreas system.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 Nov 1;5(6):1327-36. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500603. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011. PMID: 22226249 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical