Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;22(1):81-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.006.

Discovery of the mitotic selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and its implications for vertebrate development

Affiliations
Review

Discovery of the mitotic selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and its implications for vertebrate development

A Armakolas et al. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

The asymmetric cell division process is required for cellular differentiation and embryonic development. Recent evidence obtained in Drosophila and C. elegans suggest that this process occurs by non-equivalent distribution of proteins or mRNA (intrinsic factors) to daughter cells, or by their differential exposure to cell extrinsic factors. In contrast, haploid fission yeast sister cells developmentally differ by inheriting sister chromatids that are differentiated by epigenetic means. Specifically, the act of DNA replication at the mating-type locus in yeast switches it's alternate alleles only in one specific member of chromosome 2 sister chromatids in nearly every chromosome replication cycle. To employ this kind of mechanism for cellular differentiation, strictly based on Watson-Crick structure of DNA in diploid organism, selective segregation mechanism is required to coordinate distribution of potentially differentiated sister chromatids to daughter cells. Genetic evidence to this postulate was fortuitously provided by the analysis of mitotic recombinants of chromosome 7 in mouse cells. Remarkably, the biased segregation occurs in some cell types but not in others and the process seems to be chromosome-specific. This review summarizes the discovery of selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and it suggests that such a process of Somatic Sister chromatid Imprinting and Selective chromatid Segregation (SSIS model) might explain development in eukaryotes, such as that of the body axis left-right visceral organs laterality specification in mice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two theoretical possibilities of selective chromatid distribution of Chr. 7 in mouse cell mitoses. For clarity and brevity, chromosomal DNA strands found normally in the double helix configuration are presented as straight lines. The W and C strands are defined by their specific 5′–3′DNA sequence orientation. In the WW:CC designated pattern, both template [older] W [arbitrarily coloured green] strand-containing chromatids are segregated to one daughter cell and both older C [red] strand-containing chromatids are segregated to the other daughter cells to cause asymmetric cell division. Equivalent daughter cells are produced in the WC:WC segregation mode because both inherit WC′ plus W′C chromosomes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The recombination model employed to discover the biased chromatid segregation phenomenon. Mitotic crossover at the loxp sites is experimentally induced by transiently expressing Cre recombinase in cells (modified from [,] refs.). The crossover event generates one chromatid with a functional hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase minigene and those colonies inheriting the marker are selected by growing in an appropriate selective medium. The P and M allelic constitution is determined with Southern analysis. To obtain the result of all recombinants becoming homozygous for P and M alleles, as in ES and endoderm cells [Table 1], recombination must occur not in the G1 but in the G2 phase, only between specific non-sister chromatids [e.g. WC′ with W′C], and it must be followed by selective distribution of sister centromeres, as indicated in the drawing. Therefore, all M/M and P/P homozygous recombinants are interpreted to reflect the WW:CC segregation, and all P/M recombinants reflect the WC:WC segregation process. All notations are defined in Figure 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ephrussi A, Johnston D: Seeing is believing: the bicoid morphogen gradient matures. Cell 2004, 116:143–152. - PubMed
    1. Tabin C, Wolpert L: Rethinking the proximodistal axis of the vertebrate limb in the molecular era. Genes Dev 2007, 21:1433–1442. - PubMed
    1. Tickle C: Morphogen gradients in vertebrate limb development. Semin Cell Dev Biol 1999, 10:345–351. - PubMed
    1. Yamashita YM, Fuller MT: Asymmetric centrosome behavior and the mechanisms of stem cell division. J Cell Biol 2008, 180:261–266. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin H: The stem-cell niche theory: lessons from flies. Nat Rev Genet 2002, 3:931–940. - PubMed

Publication types