Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST)
- PMID: 20022428
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.024
Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST)
Abstract
The German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS) has recommended a protocol with 13 quantitative sensory testing (QST) measures for detecting somatosensory abnormalities. Reliability is an important scientific property and has been adequately tested for cutaneous QST. This study evaluates intraoral sites for which no reliability trials have yet been published. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of 13 QST measures at intra- and extraoral trigeminal sites were investigated. Twenty-one healthy volunteers from Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden (13 women and 8 men, mean age 40.4 years, range 24-71) participated. Two independent examiners previously trained in the DFNS QST protocol examined the participants using the entire protocol. Each participant was examined twice on the same day, once by each examiner (inter-examiner reliability). After 1-3 weeks, one examiner re-examined all participants (intra-examiner reliability). The measurements were made on the skin of the right cheek, the tip of the tongue, and bilaterally on the gingival mucosa of the upper premolar region. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or kappa was used to calculate variations. Most tests had acceptable to excellent inter-examiner (ICC 0.41-0.89) and intra-examiner (ICC 0.43-0.87) reliability. For each test, inter- and intra-examiner reliabilities at intra- and extraoral sites were similar. No significant differences between right and left sides were found intraorally. We conclude that inter- and intra-examiner reliabilities of most QST measures are acceptable for assessing somatosensory function in the orofacial region.
Similar articles
-
Reliability of orofacial quantitative sensory testing for pleasantness and unpleasantness.Cephalalgia. 2020 Oct;40(11):1191-1201. doi: 10.1177/0333102420929700. Epub 2020 Jun 2. Cephalalgia. 2020. PMID: 32486910
-
Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability.Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 May 1. Scand J Pain. 2017. PMID: 28850419 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of intra-oral quantitative sensory testing (QST) in patients with atypical odontalgia and healthy controls - a multicentre study.J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Feb;42(2):127-35. doi: 10.1111/joor.12245. Epub 2014 Oct 6. J Oral Rehabil. 2015. PMID: 25284726 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative sensory testing for assessment of somatosensory function in human oral mucosa: a review.Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Jan;76(1):13-20. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1375554. Epub 2017 Sep 20. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018. PMID: 28929829 Review.
-
[Quantitative Sensory Testing in the facial area: a review].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(4-5):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013. PMID: 23916267 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on painful temporomandibular disorders.Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 27;11(1):9049. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87265-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33907210 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Orofacial quantitative sensory testing: Current evidence and future perspectives.Eur J Pain. 2020 Sep;24(8):1425-1439. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1611. Epub 2020 Jun 17. Eur J Pain. 2020. PMID: 32557971 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mechanical sensitivity and psychological factors in patients with burning mouth syndrome.Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Feb;23(2):757-762. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2488-9. Epub 2018 May 18. Clin Oral Investig. 2019. PMID: 29777310
-
Resonance frequency analysis-reliability in third generation instruments: Osstell mentor®.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Sep 1;17(5):e801-6. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17861. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012. PMID: 22322519 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective orofacial quantitative sensory testing data of the human face and mouth.Data Brief. 2023 Jun 14;49:109316. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109316. eCollection 2023 Aug. Data Brief. 2023. PMID: 37360670 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aggarwal VR, McBeth J, Zakrzewska JM, Lunt M, Macfarlane GJ. The epidemiology of chronic syndromes that are frequently unexplained: do they have common associated factors? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:468-476.
-
- Antonaci F, Sand T, Lucas GA. Pressure algometry in healthy subjects: inter-examiner variability. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1998;30:3-8.
-
- Baumgartner U, Magerl W, Klein T, Hopf HC, Treede RD. Neurogenic hyperalgesia versus painful hypoalgesia: two distinct mechanisms of neuropathic pain. Pain. 2002;96:141-151.
-
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-3191.
-
- Becser N, Sand T, Zwart JA. Reliability of cephalic thermal thresholds in healthy subjects. Cephalalgia. 1998;18:574-582.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources