Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty
- PMID: 20022449
- DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.10.007
Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty
Abstract
Impingement, both prosthetic and bony, precedes the vast majority of dislocations after total hip arthroplasty and may adversely impact component wear. Reconstructed computer hip models of 8 subjects were used to evaluate hip range of motion for activities of daily living (ADLs) associated with posterior instability and anterior instability. Variables examined included acetabular position, femoral offset, and head size. The majority of flexion ADLs (associated with posterior instability) encountered prosthetic impingement, whereas extension ADLs demonstrated bony impingement with the 45/20 cup placement position. Cup placement in natural anteversion and adduction allowed normal joint motion in anterior and posterior impinging activities. Insufficient femoral offset and smaller head size negatively impacted range of motion. Any anterior cup and posterior cup protrusions greater than 5 mm should be avoided.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.J Orthop Res. 2008 Apr;26(4):443-52. doi: 10.1002/jor.20541. J Orthop Res. 2008. PMID: 18050356
-
Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.J Biomech. 2011 Jun 3;44(9):1810-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.002. Epub 2011 May 6. J Biomech. 2011. PMID: 21529811
-
Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty.Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007 Nov;22(9):1004-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Sep 17. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2007. PMID: 17870221
-
Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.Int Orthop. 2007 Aug;31 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29-33. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0429-3. Int Orthop. 2007. PMID: 17661036 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Computer-assisted total hip navigation.Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:707-20. Instr Course Lect. 2008. PMID: 18399618 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of femoral neck osteotomy on femoral component position of a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.Int Orthop. 2015 Dec;39(12):2315-21. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2739-1. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Int Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25787684
-
Does acetabular retroversion affect range of motion after total hip arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):218-24. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1482-6. Epub 2010 Jul 28. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011. PMID: 20665139 Free PMC article.
-
Does total hip arthroplasty restore native hip anatomy? three-dimensional reconstruction analysis.Int Orthop. 2014 Aug;38(8):1577-83. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2401-3. Epub 2014 Jun 26. Int Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24966079 Free PMC article.
-
Variety of femoral anteversion and its measurement in cementless total hip arthroplasty: Does robotic technology improve accuracy?J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 9;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04527-z. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38195511 Free PMC article.
-
Motion performance and impingement risk of total hip arthroplasty with a simulation module.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013 Sep;14(9):849-54. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1200168. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013. PMID: 24009206 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical