Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Jan;16(1):17-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.11.001. Epub 2009 Dec 18.

Hijacking HES1: how tumors co-opt the anti-differentiation strategies of quiescent cells

Affiliations
Review

Hijacking HES1: how tumors co-opt the anti-differentiation strategies of quiescent cells

Liyun Sang et al. Trends Mol Med. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Quiescent and tumor cells share the ability to evade irreversible cell fates. Recent studies have shown that the transcriptional regulator Hairy and Enhancer of Split 1 (HES1) protects quiescent fibroblasts from differentiation or senescence. HES1 is highly expressed in rhabdomyosarcomas, and the inhibition of HES1 restores differentiation in these cells. Pathways that lead to elevated HES1 levels, such as the Notch and Hedgehog pathways, are frequently upregulated in tumors. Compounds that inhibit these pathways induce differentiation and apoptosis in cancer cells and several are in clinical trials. HES1 might repress gene expression in part by recruiting histone deacetylases (HDACs). HDACs inhibit differentiation, whereas histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACis) induce differentiation or apoptosis in tumors and are also showing promise as therapeutics. Small molecules that directly target HES1 itself were recently identified. Here, we discuss the importance of HES1 function in quiescent and tumor cells. Elucidating the pathways that control quiescence could provide valuable information not only for treating cancer but also other diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of different cellular fates
Most cells within our body normally commit to one of five distinct cell fates: they can remain in the cell cycle and continue proliferation, or exit the cell cycle and become quiescent, senescent, differentiated or apoptotic. Quiescence is a reversible non-dividing state from which cells can be stimulated to proliferate in response to physiological signals. Senescence, differentiation, and apoptosis are all irreversible, terminal states. Senescence is a state of permanent cell-cycle arrest that can result from dysfunctional telomeres or stress. Differentiation represents the commitment to a lineage-specific cell type, such as muscle and neuron. Apoptosis is the process of programmed cell death. In contrast to normal cells, cancer cells are hyper-proliferative. They can escape senescence or apoptosis, and are poorly differentiated in many cases. A subpopulation of cells within a tumor, the cancer stem cells or dormant cancer cells, have been reported to exist in a quiescent state and thus to be responsible for the continued self-renewal capacity of the tumor.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Role of HES1 in quiescence and cancer
HES1 usually functions to inhibit differentiation in normal cells and tumors. HES1 is induced in quiescent cells, possibly through signaling from the notch pathway, the JNK pathway or other pathways. In cancer cells, HES1 upregulation likely occurs via the notch pathway or the hedgehog pathway. Small molecule inhibitors of the notch and hedgehog pathways have shown promise as anti-cancer agents possibly in part due to their effects on HES1. HES1 functions as a transcriptional repressor by interacting with histone deacetylases including HDAC1. HDACi’s have many cellular effects, including inhibition of HDAC1 activity and might thereby repress the effects of HES1. Agents that directly induce differentiation can also be effective as anti-cancer agents. Further, combinations of these agents can often be even more effective than the agents individually, possibly due to regulation of different sets of targets or a stronger regulation of key target genes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hanahan D, et al. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100:57–70. - PubMed
    1. Holyoake T, et al. Isolation of a highly quiescent subpopulation of primitive leukemic cells in chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 1999;94:2056–2064. - PubMed
    1. Jorgensen HG, et al. Lonafarnib reduces the resistance of primitive quiescent CML cells to imatinib mesylate in vitro. Leukemia. 2005;19:1184–1191. - PubMed
    1. Karantza-Wadsworth V, et al. Autophagy mitigates metabolic stress and genome damage in mammary tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1621–1635. - PMC - PubMed
    1. White E, et al. The double-edged sword of autophagy modulation in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:5308–5316. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances