Competitively selected protein ligands pay their increase in specificity by a decrease in affinity
- PMID: 20024074
- DOI: 10.1039/b910945e
Competitively selected protein ligands pay their increase in specificity by a decrease in affinity
Abstract
Protein-ligand interactions characterise and govern the current state and fate of a living cell. The specificity of proteins is mainly determined by the relative affinities to each potential ligand. To investigate the consequences and potentials of ligands with increased specificity in comparison with ligands optimised solely for affinity, it was necessary to identify ligands that are optimised towards specificity instead of a barely optimised affinity to a given target. In the presented example, a modified phage display screening procedure yielded specific ligands for the LckSH3 domain. We found that increased specificity of one of the hereby obtained ligands for LckSH3 is achieved at the cost of a slightly reduced affinity to LckSH3 and a drastically reduced affinity to other SH3 domains. A surface plasmon resonance experiment simulating in vivo-like realistic competitive binding conditions exerted enhanced binding behaviour of the specific ligand under these binding conditions. The experimental data, together with a mathematical model describing the complex experimental situation, and theoretical considerations lead to the conclusion that increased specificity is achieved at the cost of reduced affinity, but after all, it pays if the ligand is applied under realistic, i.e. competitive, conditions.
Similar articles
-
Insights into human Lck SH3 domain binding specificity: different binding modes of artificial and native ligands.Biochemistry. 2005 Nov 15;44(45):15042-52. doi: 10.1021/bi051403k. Biochemistry. 2005. PMID: 16274251
-
SH3-SPOT: an algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family.J Mol Biol. 2000 Apr 28;298(2):313-28. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3670. J Mol Biol. 2000. PMID: 10764600
-
Specificity and affinity motifs for Grb2 SH2-ligand interactions.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 25;99(13):8524-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142224499. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002. PMID: 12084912 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing the affinity and specificity of proteins with molecular display.Mol Biosyst. 2006 Jan;2(1):49-57. doi: 10.1039/b511782h. Epub 2005 Nov 8. Mol Biosyst. 2006. PMID: 16880922 Review.
-
SH3 domains and drug design: ligands, structure, and biological function.Biopolymers. 1997;43(5):383-400. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1997)43:5<383::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-R. Biopolymers. 1997. PMID: 9566119 Review.
Cited by
-
Nanodiscs allow phage display selection for ligands to non-linear epitopes on membrane proteins.PLoS One. 2013 Sep 9;8(9):e72272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072272. eCollection 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 24039747 Free PMC article.
-
Competitive Mirror Image Phage Display Derived Peptide Modulates Amyloid Beta Aggregation and Toxicity.PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0147470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147470. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 26840229 Free PMC article.
-
Phage display--a powerful technique for immunotherapy: 1. Introduction and potential of therapeutic applications.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012 Dec 1;8(12):1817-28. doi: 10.4161/hv.21703. Epub 2012 Aug 21. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012. PMID: 22906939 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources