The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis
- PMID: 2002427
- DOI: 10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis
Abstract
The predictability of branemark implants has been well documented. High success rates in the maxilla and mandible in fully and partially edentulous patients can be expected. A host of factors may be attributed to the etiology of fixture loss. However, the quality of bone stands out as the single greatest determinant in fixture loss. Types I, II, and III bone offer good strength. Type IV bone has a thin cortex and poor medullary strength with low trabecular density. Ninety percent of 1,054 implants placed were in Types I, II, and III bone. Only 3% of these fixtures were lost; of the 10% of the fixtures placed in Type IV bone, 35% failed. Presurgical determination of Type IV bone may be one method to decrease implant failure.
Similar articles
-
Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Dec;19(12):1254-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01586.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. PMID: 19040440 Clinical Trial.
-
Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991 Summer;6(2):142-6. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991. PMID: 1809668
-
Success and failure rates of cylinder implants in type IV bone.J Periodontol. 1993 Nov;64(11):1085-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1993.64.11.1085. J Periodontol. 1993. PMID: 8295096
-
Submerged or non-submerged healing of endosseous implants to be used in the rehabilitation of partially dentate patients.J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Apr;31(4):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00527.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2004. PMID: 15016259 Clinical Trial.
-
Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 Fall;5(3):272-81. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990. PMID: 2098330 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Conventional and Standardized Bone Densitometry around Implants in Periapical Radiographs during a Three Months Period.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011 Winter;8(1):33-8. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011. PMID: 22132013 Free PMC article.
-
A Prospective Clinical Cohort Investigation on Zirconia Implants: 5-Year Results.J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 10;9(8):2585. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082585. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32785031 Free PMC article.
-
Implant stability in different techniques of surgical sites preparation: an in vitro study.Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014 Dec 27;7(2):33-9. eCollection 2014 Apr-Jun. Oral Implantol (Rome). 2014. PMID: 25694799 Free PMC article.
-
Microstructural Observation with MicroCT and Histological Analysis of Human Alveolar Bone Biopsy from a Planned Implant Site: A Case Report.Open Dent J. 2013 May 17;7:47-54. doi: 10.2174/1874210601307010047. Print 2013. Open Dent J. 2013. PMID: 23802023 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative study of axial and femoral bone mineral density and parameters of mandibular bone quality in patients receiving dental implants.Osteoporos Int. 2006 Oct;17(10):1494-500. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0131-0. Epub 2006 Jun 24. Osteoporos Int. 2006. Corrected and republished in: Osteoporos Int. 2007 May;18(5):703-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0295-7. PMID: 16799754 Corrected and republished.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical