Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Feb;28(2):110-3.
doi: 10.1136/jmg.28.2.110.

Clustering of malformations in the families of South American oral cleft neonates

Affiliations

Clustering of malformations in the families of South American oral cleft neonates

B G Menegotto et al. J Med Genet. 1991 Feb.

Abstract

The relatives of 741 newborn children with non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P), of 115 with isolated cleft palate (CP), and of equal numbers of appropriate controls were screened for the presence of the same or different malformations. The main findings were as follows. (1) The frequency of familial cases of CL +/- P (17.3%) was much higher than the prevalence of this malformation among the relatives of controls (0.5%). (2) The sibs of CL +/- P subjects showed a higher prevalence of this condition than their parents (2.9% v 1.6%). (3) The degree of genetic determination of this condition should be high (70 to 74%), and the data in general favour a multifactorial model of inheritance, with different thresholds between sexes. However, the action of dominant genes cannot be excluded since selection or dominant genes or both could be postulated to explain the parent/sib difference. (4) The frequency of other malformations was also significantly raised in the families of CL +/- P probands, as compared to controls (12.1% v 6.2%). (5) The prevalence of these other malformations was higher among sibs (1.6%) than parents (0.7%) of CL +/- P babies. (6) A general susceptibility to malformations and different exposure to selective agents may explain these latter findings. (7) None of the comparisons involving CP children yielded significant results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol Suppl. 1986;2:89-97 - PubMed
    1. J Med Genet. 1988 Apr;25(4):243-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Sep;45(3):345-7 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Sep;45(3):348-53 - PubMed
    1. Cleft Palate J. 1989 Oct;26(4):318-25; discussion 325-6 - PubMed