Reasons for non-participation in a parental program concerning underage drinking: a mixed-method study
- PMID: 20025743
- PMCID: PMC2809065
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-478
Reasons for non-participation in a parental program concerning underage drinking: a mixed-method study
Abstract
Background: Alcohol consumption among adolescents is a serious public health concern. Research has shown that prevention programs targeting parents can help prevent underage drinking. The problem is that parental participation in these kinds of interventions is generally low. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine non-participation in a parental support program aiming to prevent underage alcohol drinking. The Health Belief Model has been used as a tool for the analysis.
Methods: To understand non-participation in a parental program a quasi-experimental mixed-method design was used. The participants in the study were invited to participate in a parental program targeting parents with children in school years 7-9. A questionnaire was sent home to the parents before the program started. Two follow-up surveys were also carried out. The inclusion criteria for the study were that the parents had answered the questionnaire in school year 7 and either of the questionnaires in the two subsequent school years (n = 455). Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine reasons for non-participation. The final follow-up questionnaire included an opened-ended question about reasons for non-participation. A qualitative content analysis was carried out and the two largest categories were included in the third model of the multinomial logistic regression analysis.
Results: Educational level was the most important socio-demographic factor for predicting non-participation. Parents with a lower level of education were less likely to participate than those who were more educated. Factors associated with adolescents and alcohol did not seem to be of significant importance. Instead, program-related factors predicted non-participation, e.g. parents who did not perceive any need for the intervention and who did not attend the information meeting were more likely to be non-participants. Practical issues, like time demands, also seemed to be important.
Conclusion: To design a parental program that attracts parents independently of educational level seems to be an important challenge for the future as well as program marketing. This is something that must be considered when implementing prevention programs.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of a parental program for preventing underage drinking - the NGO program strong and clear.BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 21;11:251. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-251. BMC Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21510858 Free PMC article.
-
Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun;167(6):561-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1050. JAMA Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23546617 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing youth alcohol drinking through a parent-targeted intervention: the Orebro Prevention Program.Addiction. 2008 Oct;103(10):1629-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02326.x. Addiction. 2008. PMID: 18821873
-
A systematic review of parent based programs to prevent or reduce alcohol consumption in adolescents.BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):1451. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7733-x. BMC Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31684909 Free PMC article.
-
Parenting strategies for reducing adolescent alcohol use: a Delphi consensus study.BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 6;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-13. BMC Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21210993 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Predictors of participation in parenting workshops for improving adolescent behavioral and mental health: results from the common sense parenting trial.J Prim Prev. 2015 Apr;36(2):105-18. doi: 10.1007/s10935-015-0386-3. J Prim Prev. 2015. PMID: 25656381 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review of interventions in the childcare setting with direct parental involvement: effectiveness on child weight status and energy balance-related behaviours.Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Nov 21;16(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0874-6. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019. PMID: 31752917 Free PMC article.
-
Enabling relationship formation, development, and closure in a one-year female mentoring program at a non-governmental organization: a mixed-method study.BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 24;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2850-2. BMC Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26905222 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a tobacco prevention programme among teenagers in Sweden.BMJ Open. 2015 May 14;5(5):e007673. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007673. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 25976765 Free PMC article.
-
Online psychosocial group intervention for parents: Positive effects on anxiety and depression.J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Feb 19;46(2):123-134. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa102. J Pediatr Psychol. 2021. PMID: 33230541 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Kumpfer KL, Kaftarian SJ. Bridging the Gap Between Family-Focused Research and Substance Abuse Prevention Practice: Preface. J Prim Prev. 2000;21:169–183. doi: 10.1023/A:1007079102371. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical