Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 21:8:44.
doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-44.

The influence of insurance status on waiting times in German acute care hospitals: an empirical analysis of new data

Affiliations

The influence of insurance status on waiting times in German acute care hospitals: an empirical analysis of new data

Björn A Kuchinke et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Background: There is an ongoing debate in Germany about the assumption that patients with private health insurance (PHI) benefit from better access to medical care, including shorter waiting times (Lüngen et al. 2008), compared to patients with statutory health insurance (SHI).

Problem: Existing analyses of the determinants for waiting times in Germany are a) based on patient self-reports and b) do not cover the inpatient sector. This paper aims to fill both gaps by (i) generating new primary data and (ii) analyzing waiting times in German hospitals.

Methods: We requested individual appointments from 485 hospitals within an experimental study design, allowing us to analyze the impact of PHI versus SHI on waiting times (Asplin et al. 2005).

Results: In German acute care hospitals patients with PHI have significantly shorter waiting times than patients with SHI.

Conclusion: Discrimination in waiting times by insurance status does occur in the German acute hospital sector. Since there is very little transparency in treatment quality in Germany, we do not know whether discrimination in waiting times leads to discrimination in the quality of treatment. This is an important issue for future research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sauerland D. Gesundheitspolitik in Deutschland, Reformbedarf und Entwicklungsperspektiven. 2. Gütersloh: Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2003.
    1. Gesetz zur Stärkung des Wettbewerbs in der gesetzlichen Krankenversicherung - GKV-WSG. Bundesgesetzblatt. 2007;I(11)
    1. Krobot K, Miller W, Kaufman J, Christensen D, Preisser J, Ibrahim M. The disparity in access to new medication by type of health insurance: Lessons from Germany. Medical Care. 2004;42:487–491. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000124265.13559.02. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Asplin BR. Insurance Status and Access to Urgent Ambulatory Care Follow-up Appointments. JAMA. 2005;294:1.248–1.254. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.10.1248. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Medicaid Access Study Group (MASG) Access to Medicaid recipients to outpatient care. New England Journal of Medicine. 1994;330:1.426–1.430. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources