Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar;50(1):56-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.024. Epub 2009 Dec 16.

Evaluating functional localizers: the case of the FFA

Marc G Berman  1 , Joonkoo Park, Richard Gonzalez, Thad A Polk, Amanda Gehrke, Scott Knaffla, John Jonides
Affiliations
Review

Evaluating functional localizers: the case of the FFA

Marc G Berman et al. Neuroimage. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Functional localizers are routinely used in neuroimaging studies to test hypotheses about the function of specific brain areas. The specific tasks and stimuli used to localize particular regions vary widely from study to study even when the same cortical region is targeted. Thus, it is important to ask whether task and stimulus changes lead to differences in localization or whether localization procedures are largely immune to differences in tasks and contrasting stimuli. We present two experiments and a literature review that explore whether face localizer tasks yield differential localization in the fusiform gyrus as a function of task and contrasting stimuli. We tested standard localization tasks-passive viewing, 1-back, and 2-back memory tests--and did not find differences in localization based on task. We did, however, find differences in the extent, strength and patterns/reliabilities of the activation in the fusiform gyrus based on comparison stimuli (faces vs. houses compared to faces vs. scrambled stimuli).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Peaks for different localizer task types (left). 1-back are in green, passive-viewing in blue. On the right are the peaks for the different contrasting stimuli. Peaks for different contrasting stimuli (right). Multi-objects are in blue, scrambles in red, and single-objects in green.
Figure 2
Figure 2
3-Dimensional 68% confidence intervals for passive viewing (blue) and 1-back (green) tasks. The coordinates represent the dimensions in Talairach Space in millimeter units.
Figure 3
Figure 3
3-Dimensional 68% confidence interval for multiple object (blue), single object (green), and scrambled images (red) as comparison stimuli. The coordinates represent the dimensions in Talairach Space in millimeter units
Figure 4
Figure 4
Plotted Peaks for each participant for each run of the passive viewing, 1-back and 2-back memory tests for Faces > Houses. Blue denotes passive viewing, green denotes 1-back, and red denotes 2-back. Spheres denote the first iteration of the task, and cubes denote the second iteration. From the figure one can see no discernable pattern of changes in peak location based on task, or the first or second iteration of performing the same task.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean (± 1 standard error) within-task Consistency Ratios across all subjects, as a function of increasing the threshold for what constitutes an active voxel in our right fusiform ROI.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean (± 1 standard error) within-task Consistency Ratios across all subjects, as a function of increasing the threshold for what constitutes an active voxel in our left fusiform ROI.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mean (± 1 standard error) Consistency Calculations for both within- and between-task for the left and right Fusiform ROIs.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Consistency results for Experiment 2 for the left and right ROIs for passive viewing and one-back for different comparison stimuli (houses and scrambles)
Figure 9
Figure 9
Pearson correlations between- and within-task for Experiment 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aguirre GK, Singh R, D'Esposito M. Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. Neuroreport. 1999;10(1):189–194. - PubMed
    1. Andrews TJ, Ewbank MP. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. NeuroImage. 2004;23(3):905–913. - PubMed
    1. Andrews TJ, Schluppeck D. Neural responses to money images reveal a modular representation of faces in human visual cortex. NeuroImage. 2004;21(1):91–98. - PubMed
    1. Avidan G, Levy I, Hendler T, Zohary E, Malach R. Spatial vs. object specific attention in high-order visual areas. NeuroImage. 2003;19(2):308–318. - PubMed
    1. Caldara R, Seghier ML, Rossion B, Lazeyras F, Michel C, Hauert CA. The fusiform face area is tuned for curvilinear patterns with more high-contrasted elements in the upper part. NeuroImage. 2006;31(1):313–319. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources