Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 27;365(1538):259-69.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0177.

Rational choice, neuroeconomy and mixed emotions

Affiliations

Rational choice, neuroeconomy and mixed emotions

Pierre Livet. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Experimental psychology has shown differences between predictions of theory of decision and human choices. Emotions like regret can partly explain these differences. Neuroimagery used in combination with behavioural economics (neuroeconomics) has been used in order to try to disentangle the different emotional and rational factors (regret, rejoicing, reward, costs, uncertainty, trade-off between positive and negative aspects of different options). Emotions then appear as much more complex and mixed affective states than usually assumed. Not only might we feel a positive affect in punishing unfair partners, but mixed emotions can, for example, combine transmutation of previous anxiety into relief and elation by comparison with another less exciting option (elating relief). At the level of complexity of these mixed emotions--which we formally represent by comparisons between 'unexpected utilities' and expected ones--the main biases that Kahnemann and Tversky have shown can be explained. In spite of the complexity of these mixed emotions, some of these hypotheses might be partially tested by brain imagery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Elation: Expected bigger gain (Gmax1) = Gmax1 × p1 = Black + Green, Unexpected Gmax1 = Violet + Yellow + Blue = Gmax1 × (1 − p1), Expected Gmax2 = Red + Blue = Gmax2 × p2, Gmax2 (p1 × p2 = Red = Gmax2 in S1, already subtracted when subtracting expected G1max, (G1maxG2max) × (1 − p1)p2 = Yellow: unexpected G1max gain in comparison with G2max in the realm of (1 − p1) situations. G2max × p1(1 − p2) = Brown = in S2, expected G2max in the realm of (1 − p1), still to be subtracted, Elation = G1max(1 − p1) − G2max(1 − p1)p2 = Cube − (Black + Green + Blue) = Yellow + Violet. Additional anxiety: Missed expected bigger gain=Gmax1 × (1 − p1) = Violet + Yellow + Blue. It has to be subtracted, letting p1 situations. Missed unexpected bigger gain=Gmax1 × p1 = Black + Green. Missed expected smaller gain (1 − p2) in the realm of p1 = G2max × p1(1 − p2) = Brown: G2max in S2. Additional Anxiety: (Gmax1 × p1) − Gmax2 × p1(1 − p2) = Cube − (Violet + Yellow + Blue + Brown) = Black + Green − Brown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Acker M.1997Tempered regrets under total ignorance. Theory Deci. 42, 207–213 (doi:10.1023/A:1004907110913) - DOI
    1. Baumgartner T., Heinrichs M., Vonlanthen A., Fischbacher U., Fehr E.2008Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron 58, 639–650 (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bechara A., Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Anderson S. W.1994Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50, 7–15 (doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Camille N., Coricelli G., Sallet J., Pradat-Diehl P., Duhamel J.-R., Sirigu A.2004The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in the experience of regret. Science 304, 1167–1170 (doi:10.1126/science.1094550) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coricelli G., Critchley H., Jollify M., O'Doherty M., Sirigu A., Dolan R.2005Regret and its avoidance: a neuroimaging study of choice behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1255–1262 (doi:10.1038/nn1514) - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources