Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients
- PMID: 20027094
- DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181c15493
Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients
Abstract
Purpose: To reduce the incisional morbidity and improve cosmesis, the authors adopted a single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using a unique "single-port". The authors retrospectively evaluated transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) against conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) with respect to perioperative outcomes and operative cost in the adult patients.
Materials and methods: The authors reviewed the case of laparoscopic appendectomy between April 2008 and January 2009. Demographic data, operating time, pathology of appendix, hospital stay, surgical morbidities, visual analogue scale pain scores, analgesics requirements, and the operative cost were compared.
Results: Seventy-two underwent TUSPLA and 108 underwent CLA. There were more females in the TUSPLA group. Surgical outcomes were similar between the TUSPLA and the CLA group. Operative cost was significantly lower in the TUSPLA group compared with the CLA group.
Conclusions: This study showed that TUSPLA was cost saving and produced similar surgical outcomes in selected appendicitis patients compared with CLA.
Similar articles
-
A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses.Surgery. 2001 Apr;129(4):390-400. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.114216. Surgery. 2001. PMID: 11283528 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4. Isr Med Assoc J. 2002. PMID: 11875999
-
Treatment of acute appendicitis with one-port transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy: a six-year, single-centre experience.Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010 Sep-Dec;7(3):169-73. doi: 10.4103/0189-6725.70419. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2010. PMID: 20859023
-
The minimally invasive approach to appendectomy: is less better?Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jun;22(3):201-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1320015. Epub 2012 Jul 5. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2012. PMID: 22767173 Review.
-
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7. G Chir. 2001. PMID: 11816948 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Safety and efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for appendectomies: a meta-analysis.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 7;19(25):4072-82. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.4072. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23840155 Free PMC article.
-
Single port laparoscopic appendectomy: are we pursuing real advantages?World J Emerg Surg. 2011 Aug 10;6:25. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-6-25. World J Emerg Surg. 2011. PMID: 21831313 Free PMC article.
-
Partial splenectomy: A case series and systematic review of the literature.Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 May;22(2):116-127. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2018.22.2.116. Epub 2018 May 30. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018. PMID: 29896572 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and Efficacy of Single-Port Laparoscopic Ileostomy in Palliative Settings.Ann Coloproctol. 2020 Feb;36(1):17-21. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.04.25. Epub 2020 Feb 29. Ann Coloproctol. 2020. PMID: 32146784 Free PMC article.
-
Single-port laparoscopic surgery in acute appendicitis: retrospective comparative analysis for 618 patients.Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4968-4975. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4840-y. Epub 2016 Mar 16. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 26983434
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous