Semiautomatic lymph node segmentation in multislice computed tomography: impact of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision, and interobserver variability
- PMID: 20027120
- DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181c443e1
Semiautomatic lymph node segmentation in multislice computed tomography: impact of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision, and interobserver variability
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the impact of slice thickness on semiautomatic lymph node analysis.
Materials and methods: Thoracic multislice computed tomography (MSCT) of 46 patients with NSCLC were reconstructed at 1.0-, 3.0-, and 5.0-mm slice thickness. Two radiologists independently determined long and short axis diameter and volume of 299 thoracic lymph nodes by semiautomatic segmentation software. Necessity of manual correction (= relative difference between uncorrected and corrected segmented lymph node volume) and relative interobserver differences were determined. The precision of segmentation was expressed by relative measurement deviations (RMD) from the reference standard (mean of 1.0 mm datasets). Statistical analysis encompassed t test and Bland-Altman plots.
Results: Necessity of manual correction was significantly higher for 5.0 mm than for 3.0 (P = 0.042) or 1.0 mm (P = 0.0012). The RMD for long and short axis diameter were found to be independent of slice thickness, whereas the RMD for lymph node volume significantly (P = 0.021) increased from 4.0% at 1.0 mm (95% CI: 1.0%-3.5%) to 35% at 5.0 mm (95% CI: 10.5%-60.5%). The relative interobserver differences was consistently low for metric and volumetric parameters (eg, volume 2.3%, 95% CI: -7.4%-10.8% at 5.0 mm) with no difference in any of the slice thicknesses (P > 0.064).
Conclusions: Significant deviations in lymph node volume together with excessive manual corrections suggest reconstruction of the data for semiautomatic lymph node assessment at a slice thickness of 1.0 mm but not exceeding 3.0 mm.
Similar articles
-
Clinical lymph node staging--influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements.Eur J Radiol. 2012 Nov;81(11):3124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Mar 29. Eur J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22464844
-
Measurement accuracy and reproducibility of semiautomated metric and volumetric lymph node analysis in MDCT.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Oct;195(4):979-85. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4010. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010. PMID: 20858828
-
Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability.Rofo. 2011 Apr;183(4):372-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245983. Epub 2011 Jan 18. Rofo. 2011. PMID: 21246480
-
MSCT follow-up in malignant lymphoma: comparison of manual linear measurements with semi-automated lymph node analysis for therapy response classification.Rofo. 2012 Sep;184(9):795-804. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312751. Epub 2012 May 22. Rofo. 2012. PMID: 22618478
-
Informatics in radiology: postprocessing pitfalls in using CT for automatic and semiautomatic determination of global left ventricular function.Radiographics. 2012 Mar-Apr;32(2):589-99. doi: 10.1148/rg.322115058. Epub 2012 Feb 8. Radiographics. 2012. PMID: 22323618 Review.
Cited by
-
Semi-automated volumetric analysis of lymph node metastases during follow-up--initial results.Eur Radiol. 2011 Apr;21(4):683-92. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1966-5. Epub 2010 Oct 17. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20953870
-
Abdominal and pelvic CT: is positive enteric contrast still necessary? Results of a retrospective observational study.Eur Radiol. 2015 Mar;25(3):669-78. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3446-9. Epub 2014 Oct 15. Eur Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25316055
-
Is it possible to estimate volume of bone defects formed on dry sheep mandibles more practically by secondarily reconstructing section thickness of cone beam computed tomography images?Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;50(3):20200400. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200400. Epub 2020 Oct 15. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33035111 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Volumetric versus Manual Measurement in Disseminated Testicular Cancer; No Difference in Assessment between Non-Radiologists and Genitourinary Radiologist.PLoS One. 2017 Jan 12;12(1):e0168977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168977. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 28081195 Free PMC article.
-
ESR Essentials: a step-by-step guide of segmentation for radiologists-practice recommendations by the European Society of Medical Imaging Informatics.Eur Radiol. 2025 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11621-1. Online ahead of print. Eur Radiol. 2025. PMID: 40402288 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical