Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Dec 22:9:36.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-36.

Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study

Karsten J Jørgensen et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Overdiagnosis in cancer screening is the detection of cancer lesions that would otherwise not have been detected. It is arguably the most important harm. We quantified overdiagnosis in the Danish mammography screening programme, which is uniquely suited for this purpose, as only 20% of the Danish population has been offered organised mammography screening over a long time-period.

Methods: We collected incidence rates of carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer in areas with and without screening over 13 years with screening (1991-2003), and 20 years before its introduction (1971-1990). We explored the incidence increase comparing unadjusted incidence rates and used Poisson regression analysis to compensate for the background incidence trend, variation in age distribution and geographical variation in incidence.

Results: For the screened age group, 50 to 69 years, we found an overdiagnosis of 35% when we compared unadjusted incidence rates for the screened and non-screened areas, but after compensating for a small decline in incidence in older, previously screened women. Our adjusted Poisson regression analysis indicated a relative risk of 1.40 (95% CI: 1.35-1.45) for the whole screening period, and a potential compensatory drop in older women of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96), yielding an overdiagnosis of 33%, which we consider the most reliable estimate. The drop in previously screened women was only present in one of the two screened regions and was small in absolute numbers.

Discussion: One in four breast cancers diagnosed in the screened age group in the Danish screening programme is overdiagnosed. Our estimate for Denmark is lower than that for comparable countries, likely because of lower uptake, lower recall rates and lower detection rates of carcinoma in situ.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Unadjusted incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancers per 100,000 women ages 50-69 years in areas without mammography screening and in Copenhagen and in Funen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unadjusted incidence of in situ lesions only, per 100,000 women ages 50-69 years, in areas without mammography screening and in Copenhagen and in Funen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Unadjusted incidence of in situ lesions and invasive breast cancers per 100,000 women ages 70-79 years in areas without mammography screening and in Copenhagen and in Funen.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Unadjusted incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancers per 100,000 women ages 35-49 years in areas without mammography screening and in Copenhagen and in Funen.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Etzioni R, Urban N, Ramsey S, McIntosh M, Schwartz S, Reid B. The case for early detection. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:243–52. doi: 10.1038/nrc1041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vainio H, Bianchini F. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Breast Cancer Screening. Vol. 7. Lyon; IARC Press; 2002.
    1. Fryback DG, Stout NK, Rosenberg MA. The Wisconsin breast cancer epidemiology simulation model. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2006;36:37–47. - PubMed
    1. Zahl PH, Mæhlen J, Welch GH. The natural history of breast cancer detected by screening mammography. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2311–2316. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.21.2311. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Welch GH. Should I be tested for cancer? Berkeley and Los Angeles, California; University of California Press, Ltd; 2004.

Publication types

MeSH terms