Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study
- PMID: 20028513
- PMCID: PMC2807851
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-36
Overdiagnosis in organised mammography screening in Denmark. A comparative study
Abstract
Background: Overdiagnosis in cancer screening is the detection of cancer lesions that would otherwise not have been detected. It is arguably the most important harm. We quantified overdiagnosis in the Danish mammography screening programme, which is uniquely suited for this purpose, as only 20% of the Danish population has been offered organised mammography screening over a long time-period.
Methods: We collected incidence rates of carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer in areas with and without screening over 13 years with screening (1991-2003), and 20 years before its introduction (1971-1990). We explored the incidence increase comparing unadjusted incidence rates and used Poisson regression analysis to compensate for the background incidence trend, variation in age distribution and geographical variation in incidence.
Results: For the screened age group, 50 to 69 years, we found an overdiagnosis of 35% when we compared unadjusted incidence rates for the screened and non-screened areas, but after compensating for a small decline in incidence in older, previously screened women. Our adjusted Poisson regression analysis indicated a relative risk of 1.40 (95% CI: 1.35-1.45) for the whole screening period, and a potential compensatory drop in older women of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96), yielding an overdiagnosis of 33%, which we consider the most reliable estimate. The drop in previously screened women was only present in one of the two screened regions and was small in absolute numbers.
Discussion: One in four breast cancers diagnosed in the screened age group in the Danish screening programme is overdiagnosed. Our estimate for Denmark is lower than that for comparable countries, likely because of lower uptake, lower recall rates and lower detection rates of carcinoma in situ.
Figures




Comment in
-
The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution.BMC Womens Health. 2009 Dec 16;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-34. BMC Womens Health. 2009. PMID: 20015373 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
The overdiagnosis nightmare: a time for caution.BMC Womens Health. 2009 Dec 16;9:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-9-34. BMC Womens Health. 2009. PMID: 20015373 Free PMC article.
-
Overdiagnosis in screening mammography in Denmark: population based cohort study.BMJ. 2013 Feb 26;346:f1064. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1064. BMJ. 2013. PMID: 23444414 Free PMC article.
-
Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.Cancer. 1998 Apr 15;82(8):1521-8. Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9554530 Clinical Trial.
-
Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):111-21. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr009. Epub 2011 Jun 27. Epidemiol Rev. 2011. PMID: 21709144 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Discrepancies and overdiagnosis in breast cancer organized screening. A "methodology" systematic review].Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018 Nov;66(6):395-403. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2018. PMID: 30316554 French.
Cited by
-
Plasma MicroRNA Pair Panels as Novel Biomarkers for Detection of Early Stage Breast Cancer.Front Physiol. 2019 Jan 8;9:1879. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01879. eCollection 2018. Front Physiol. 2019. PMID: 30670982 Free PMC article.
-
Were our estimates of overdiagnosis with mammography screening in the United States "based on faulty science"?Oncologist. 2014 Feb;19(2):113-26. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0383. Oncologist. 2014. PMID: 24536052 Free PMC article.
-
Urban-rural differences in a population-based breast cancer screening program in Croatia.Croat Med J. 2011 Feb;52(1):76-86. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.76. Croat Med J. 2011. PMID: 21328724 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosing overdiagnosis: conceptual challenges and suggested solutions.Eur J Epidemiol. 2014 Sep;29(9):599-604. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9920-5. Epub 2014 Jun 1. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014. PMID: 24880635 No abstract available.
-
To Consent or Not to Consent to Screening, That Is the Question.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 30;11(7):982. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11070982. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37046909 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vainio H, Bianchini F. IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Breast Cancer Screening. Vol. 7. Lyon; IARC Press; 2002.
-
- Fryback DG, Stout NK, Rosenberg MA. The Wisconsin breast cancer epidemiology simulation model. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2006;36:37–47. - PubMed
-
- Welch GH. Should I be tested for cancer? Berkeley and Los Angeles, California; University of California Press, Ltd; 2004.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical