Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1991 Jan-Feb;12(1):25-30.
doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(91)90035-i.

Acquisition and long-term retention of a two-lever DRL schedule: comparison between mature and aged rats

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Acquisition and long-term retention of a two-lever DRL schedule: comparison between mature and aged rats

M Soffié et al. Neurobiol Aging. 1991 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

The effects of ageing on temporal regulation, general activity and memory were analysed in a two-lever DRL schedule. The task consisted in pressing on lever A and then waiting a minimum of time before pressing lever B to get the reinforcer. Adult and senescent rats were submitted to preliminary training followed by 5 DRL 5-second training sessions and 3 retention testing sessions after a 21-day break. Results showed that, relative to adults, senescent rats were slower to reach the 5-second DRL criterion, emitted fewer temporally regulated A-B response sequences and an equivalent amount of repetitive superfluous A-A and B-B response sequences. The quality of temporal regulation was evaluated by the coefficient of variation (CV) and the median of the A-B interresponse-time distribution. In training, aged rats exhibited a higher CV only during the first 10-minute periods of the sessions, and emitted median IRTs similar to those of adults. The B-A intertrial-intervals were longer in aged than in adult rats. No age-related differences appeared for efficiency. Finally, long-term retention was not affected in either age group. The results favour an interpretation in terms of temporary recall memory deficit with a preservation of temporal regulation capacity, rather than age-related motor and motivational differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources