Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;48(6):438-50.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.164. Epub 2009 Dec 22.

Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

Affiliations

Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

M R Hill et al. Spinal Cord. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Study design: A systematic review.

Objective: To critically review quality of life (QOL) instruments used with spinal cord injury (SCI) populations.

Setting: Vancouver, Canada.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted for publications assessing the measurement properties of QOL outcome measures. Pre-established criteria were used to evaluate the measurement properties.

Results: Fourteen articles reporting on 13 QOL instruments met the inclusion criteria, including the Patient Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (PRISM), Quality of Well-being Scale, Qualiveen, Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68), Short Form (SF)-36, SF-36V, SF-12, SF-6D, Quality of Life Index, Quality of Life Profile for Adults with Physical Disabilities (QOLP-PD), Satisfaction with Life Scale, Sense of Well-being Index (SWBI), and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scale (WHOQOL-BREF). The SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF have been widely used and validated. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising with limited investigation. The Qualiveen and PRISM performed well and are specific to SCI complications.

Conclusion: The WHOQOL-BREF is presently the most acceptable and established instrument to assess QOL after SCI. The SIP68, QOLP-PD, SF-36V, and SWBI are promising; however, require further evaluation of their measurement properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jang Y, Hsieh CL, Wang YH, Wu YH. A validity study of the WHOQOL-BREF assessment in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1890–1895. - PubMed
    1. May LA, Warren S. Measuring quality of life of persons with spinal cord injury: external and structural validity. Spinal Cord. 2002 Jul;40(7):341–350. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor PJ. Survival after spinal cord injury in Australia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jan;86(1):37–47. - PubMed
    1. Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):877–884. - PubMed
    1. Dijkers MP. Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Aug;80(8):867–876. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding