Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results of three device generations of the CoreValve Revalving system
- PMID: 20031675
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.819839
Progress and current status of percutaneous aortic valve replacement: results of three device generations of the CoreValve Revalving system
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous aortic valve replacement is a new emerging technology for interventional treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis in surgical high-risk patients. This study was intended to provide a summary of the development and current safety and efficacy status of the self-expanding CoreValve Revalving prosthesis.
Method and results: Between 2005 and 2008, we have enrolled 136 consecutive patients with percutaneous aortic valve replacement using the CoreValve prosthesis. In this prospective nonrandomized, single-center trial, we analyzed procedural outcome, complications and clinical status up to 1 year. First, second, and third generation of the CoreValve prosthesis were implanted in 10, 24, and 102 consecutive high-risk patients (logistic EuroScore: 23.1+/-15.0%) with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 41.5+/-16.7 mm Hg. The procedural success rate increased from generation 1/2 to 3 from 70.0%/70.8% to 91.2% (P=0.003). The 30-day combined rate of death/stroke/myocardial infarction was 40.0%/20.8%/14.7% (P=0.11) for generation 1, 2, and 3, with no procedural death in generation 3. Pressure gradients improved significantly with a final mean gradient of 8.1+/-3.8 mm Hg. Overall functional status assessed by New York Heart Association class improved from 3.3+/-0.5 (pre) to 1.7+/-0.7 (post) (P<0.001) and remained stable in the follow-up.
Conclusions: In experienced hands, percutaneous aortic valve replacement with the CoreValve system for selected patients with severe aortic valve stenosis has a high acute success rate associated with a low periprocedural mortality/stroke rate as well as remarkable clinical and hemodynamic improvements, which persist over time. Additional studies are now required to confirm these findings, particularly head-to-head comparisons with surgical valve replacement in different risk populations.
Comment in
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: past, present, and future.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec;1(3):159-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.833533. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008. PMID: 20031672 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients using the second- and current third-generation self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis: device success and 30-day clinical outcome.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 3;50(1):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.04.047. Epub 2007 Jun 6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17601548 Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study.Circulation. 2006 Oct 10;114(15):1616-24. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.639450. Epub 2006 Oct 2. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 17015786 Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical aspects of endovascular retrograde implantation of the aortic CoreValve bioprosthesis in high-risk older patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Nov;134(5):1150-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.07.031. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 17976442
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with critical aortic stenosis: rationale, device descriptions, early clinical experiences, and perspectives.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Summer;18(2):165-74. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2006.08.002. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006. PMID: 17157238 Review.
-
Outcomes and safety of percutaneous aortic valve replacement.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 19;53(20):1829-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.059. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19442881 Review.
Cited by
-
Self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis after mitral valve surgery.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Jul;17(1):90-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt086. Epub 2013 Mar 28. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23537849 Free PMC article.
-
Transthoracic delivery of large devices into the left ventricle through the right ventricle and interventricular septum: preclinical feasibility.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jan 18;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-10. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013. PMID: 23331459 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: evidence on safety and efficacy compared with medical therapy. A systematic review of current literature.Clin Res Cardiol. 2011 Apr;100(4):265-76. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0268-x. Epub 2010 Dec 17. Clin Res Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 21165626
-
Echocardiographic outcomes of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN XT valves: the comparison of two bioprosthesis implanted in a single centre.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Sep;32(9):1371-1378. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0924-y. Epub 2016 Jun 9. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27278270
-
Management of percutaneous self-expanding bioprosthesis migration.Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Oct;99(10):673-6. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0180-4. Epub 2010 Jul 9. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20617324 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources