Two-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial
- PMID: 20031737
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.831800.108.831800
Two-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial
Abstract
Background: This article reports the 2-year clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound outcomes of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in the randomized SPIRIT II trial.
Methods and results: This was a prospective, single-blind clinical trial in which a total of 300 patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions were randomized to either EES or PES in a 3:1 fashion. Clinical follow-up was planned at 2 years in all patients. A subset of 152 patients underwent serial angiographic and intravascular ultrasound analyses at 6 months and 2 years. After 2 years, target lesion failure (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization) rates were 6.6% and 11% in EES and PES, respectively (P=0.31). At 6 months, a significant reduction in angiographic in-stent late loss and percentage volume obstruction measured by intravascular ultrasound was observed in the EES group. However, at 2-year follow-up, a late increased intimal hyperplasia growth after implantation of an EES was observed. There were no significant differences between EES and PES for in-stent late loss (EES, 0.33+/-0.37 mm versus PES, 0.34+/-0.34 mm; P=0.84) and percentage volume obstruction (EES, 5.18+/-6.22% versus PES, 5.80+/-6.31%; P=0.65) at 2 years. The incidence of stent thrombosis was low and comparable in both groups (EES, 0.9%; PES, 1.4%).
Conclusions: Although the previously reported angiographic and clinical superiority of the EES has vanished over time, this report confirms and extends the previously demonstrated noninferiority in terms of in-stent late loss of the EES when compared with the PES up to 2-year follow-up. There were no significant differences between EES and PES in clinical, angiographic and intravascular ultrasound outcomes at 2 years.
Similar articles
-
3-year clinical follow-up of the XIENCE V everolimus-eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions: the SPIRIT II trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients with de novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Dec;2(12):1190-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.10.002. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009. PMID: 20129545 Clinical Trial.
-
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 24239202 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 22115661
-
The paclitaxel (TAXUS)-eluting stent: a review of its use in the management of de novo coronary artery lesions.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2004;4(4):257-68. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200404040-00006. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15285700 Review.
-
Drug-eluting stent fracture: incidence, contributing factors, and clinical implications.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Feb 1;75(2):237-45. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22212. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 20025045 Review.
Cited by
-
A prospective, multicenter, post marketing surveillance study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Superia-Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (SSECSS) implanted during routine clinical practice in India.Indian Heart J. 2014 Nov-Dec;66(6):682-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.10.422. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Indian Heart J. 2014. PMID: 25634405 Free PMC article.
-
Serial changes of neointimal tissue after everolimus-eluting stent implantation in porcine coronary artery: an optical coherence tomography analysis.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:851676. doi: 10.1155/2014/851676. Epub 2014 Sep 18. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 25309929 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effectiveness of ultrathin vs. standard strut drug-eluting stents: insights from a large-scale meta-analysis with extended follow-up.Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 27;29(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01949-7. Eur J Med Res. 2024. PMID: 39068447 Free PMC article.
-
The molecular mechanisms of congenital hypofibrinogenaemia.Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004 Jun;61(12):1427-38. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-3458-8. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004. PMID: 15197468 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Second- and third-generation drug-eluting coronary stents: progress and safety.Herz. 2011 May;36(3):190-6. doi: 10.1007/s00059-011-3458-z. Herz. 2011. PMID: 21505934
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical