Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk
- PMID: 20031890
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848259
Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk
Abstract
Background: Some patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) do not undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) despite demonstrated symptomatic and survival advantages and despite unequivocal guideline recommendations for surgical evaluation.
Methods and results: In 3 large tertiary care institutions (university, Veterans Affairs, and private practice) in Washtenaw County, Mich, patients were identified with unrefuted echocardiography/Doppler evidence of severe AS during calendar year 2005. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for symptoms, referral for AVR, calculated operative risk for AVR, and rationale as to why patients did not undergo valve replacement. Of 369 patients with severe AS, 191 (52%) did not undergo AVR. Of these, 126 (66%, 34% of total) had symptoms consistent with AS. The most common reasons cited for absent intervention were comorbidities with high operative risk (61 patients [48%]), patent refusal (24 patients [19%]), and symptoms unrelated to AS (24 patients [19%]). Operated patients had a lower Society of Thoracic Surgery-calculated perioperative mortality risk than unoperated patients (1.8% [interquartile range, 1.0 to 3.0%] versus 2.7% [interquartile range, 1.6 to 5.5%], P<0.001). However, 28 (24%) of 126 unoperated symptomatic patients had a calculated perioperative risk less than the median risk for patients who underwent AVR. Only 57 (30%) of 191 unoperated patients were evaluated by a cardiac surgeon. There were similar rates of intervention across practice settings, and similar rates of unoperated patients despite symptoms and low operative risk.
Conclusions: One third of patients with severe AS are symptomatic but do not undergo AVR, with similar findings in multiple practice environments. For most unoperated patients, objectively calculated operative risks did not appear prohibitive. Despite this, a minority of unoperated patients were referred for surgical consultation. Some patients with severe symptomatic AS may be inappropriately denied access to potentially life-saving therapy.
Comment in
-
Sharing decision making about cardiac surgery: improving the quality of the decision to undergo or forego surgery.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):519-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.912246. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009. PMID: 20031887 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence and characteristics of unoperated patients with severe aortic stenosis.J Heart Valve Dis. 2011 May;20(3):284-91. J Heart Valve Dis. 2011. PMID: 21714418
-
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation decreases the rate of unoperated aortic stenosis.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jul;40(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.031. Epub 2011 Jan 12. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21232970
-
Reasons for nonadherence to guidelines for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and potential solutions.Am J Cardiol. 2010 May 1;105(9):1339-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.056. Epub 2010 Mar 11. Am J Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20403489
-
Meta-analysis of the impact of intervention versus symptom-driven management in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis.Heart. 2017 Feb 15;103(4):268-272. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309830. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Heart. 2017. PMID: 27540178 Review.
-
Aortic valve replacement for patients with mild to moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.Clin Cardiol. 2000 Mar;23(3):141-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960230303. Clin Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10761799 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The direct health-care burden of valvular heart disease: evidence from US national survey data.Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct 18;8:613-627. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S112691. eCollection 2016. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016. PMID: 27799803 Free PMC article.
-
Editorial: Comorbidities and Aortic Valve Stenosis: Molecular Mechanism, Risk Factors and Novel Therapeutic Options.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 4;8:811310. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.811310. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 35059452 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Early and late outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: an Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database Study.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.059. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012. PMID: 21601470 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of selected comorbidities on the presentation and management of aortic stenosis.Open Heart. 2020 Jul;7(2):e001271. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001271. Open Heart. 2020. PMID: 32709699 Free PMC article.
-
Health-related quality of life following transcatheter aortic valve implantation using transaortic, transfemoral approaches and surgical aortic valve replacement-a single-center study.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Nov;15(11):657-665. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.11.002. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30534139 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials