Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time
- PMID: 20032801
- DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283355c5d
Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time
Abstract
Objective: Three-dimensional (3D) mode positron emission tomography (PET) is being used increasingly for clinical PET imaging. However, as yet, optimal acquisition parameters have not been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of varying acquisition time on 3D image quality using standard clinical activities of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG).
Methods: F-FDG phantom and patient PET images were acquired with varying acquisition times on a GE Discovery-STE PET/CT system. The NEMA Image-Quality phantom was imaged with four hot lesions in a uniform background. Images were acquired for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5-min frames with three different lesion-to-background contrast ratios. Patient data were investigated using list mode acquisition to obtain comparable 2, 3, and 4-min frames. Qualitative analysis involved grading image quality and lesion detectability. Quantitative analysis of phantom images involved assessing the coefficient of variation (COV) of background areas as a measure of noise, and lesion over background variability as a measure of image quality. Patient data were also assessed using COV analysis of liver uptake.
Results: Qualitative and quantitative analysis showed no significant difference in image quality between 4 and 5-min acquisition frames for 3D mode F-FDG PET imaging with standard clinical activities. The observers noted no difference in perceived image quality. This finding was supported by COV analysis.
Conclusion: This study shows that GE Discovery-STE acquisition frame time can be reduced to 3 min for standard 3D mode imaging at standard clinical activities of F-FDG.
Similar articles
-
Two-dimensional vs three-dimensional imaging in whole body oncologic PET/CT: a Discovery-STE phantom and patient study.Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007 Sep;51(3):214-23. Epub 2007 Apr 30. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17464266
-
Objective and subjective comparison of standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data on a PET/CT system.Nucl Med Commun. 2007 Jul;28(7):555-9. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328194f1e3. Nucl Med Commun. 2007. PMID: 17538397
-
Optimizing imaging protocols for overweight and obese patients: a lutetium orthosilicate PET/CT study.J Nucl Med. 2005 Apr;46(4):603-7. J Nucl Med. 2005. PMID: 15809482 Clinical Trial.
-
Considerations for generic oncology FDG-PET/CT protocol preparation in drug development.IDrugs. 2007 Nov;10(11):791-6. IDrugs. 2007. PMID: 17968761 Review.
-
Quantitative analysis of PET studies.Radiother Oncol. 2010 Sep;96(3):308-10. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 23. Radiother Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20656363 Review.
Cited by
-
3D-OSEM versus FORE + OSEM: Optimal Reconstruction Algorithm for FDG PET with a Short Acquisition Time.World J Nucl Med. 2023 Sep 13;22(3):234-243. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1774418. eCollection 2023 Sep. World J Nucl Med. 2023. PMID: 37854086 Free PMC article.
-
For avid glucose tumors, the SUV peak is the most reliable parameter for [(18)F]FDG-PET/CT quantification, regardless of acquisition time.EJNMMI Res. 2016 Dec;6(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13550-016-0177-8. Epub 2016 Mar 5. EJNMMI Res. 2016. PMID: 26944734 Free PMC article.
-
Low-dose radiation protocol using 3D mode in a BGO PET/CT.Radiol Med. 2015 Feb;120(2):251-5. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0422-z. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Radiol Med. 2015. PMID: 24903708
-
PET NEMA IQ Phantom dataset: image reconstruction settings for quantitative PET imaging.Data Brief. 2021 Jun 18;37:107231. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107231. eCollection 2021 Aug. Data Brief. 2021. PMID: 34195308 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative analysis of image metrics for reduced and standard dose pediatric 18F-FDG PET/MRI examinations.Br J Radiol. 2019 Mar;92(1095):20180438. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180438. Epub 2019 Jan 23. Br J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30673306 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials