Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jun;24(6):1318-24.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0767-x. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

Tensile strength and adhesion formation of mesh fixation systems used in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Tensile strength and adhesion formation of mesh fixation systems used in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair

Christian Hollinsky et al. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Mesh tearoff from the tissue is the most common reason for hernia recurrence after hernia surgery involving the use of a synthetic mesh. Various fixation systems were critically compared in terms of their retention strength and the formation of adhesions.

Methods: In a prospective study with 25 Sprague-Dawley rats, two pieces of Parietex composite meshes measuring 2 x 3 cm were fixed intraperitoneally in a paramedian location. The randomized mesh fixation groups included transfascial fixed suture, ProTack, AbsorbaTack, and I-Clip. Of the 25 rats, 12 were killed and analyzed 1 week after implantation, with the remaining 13 rats killed and analyzed after 2 months. Adhesions observed at the time of mesh removal were measured according to an adhesion scoring system, and the fixation strengths of the individual fixation systems were tested. Additionally, the foreign body reaction to the mesh and fixation systems was measured as well as their potential degradation.

Results: After 1 week, the retention strength of transfascial fixed suture was significantly higher (8.7 N/cm(2)) than that of ProTack (5.6 N/cm(2)) or AbsorbaTack (5.7 N/cm(2)). After 2 months, the retention strength had increased to 13.2 N/cm(2) in the transfascial fixed suture group, which was significantly higher than in the ProTack (9.7 N/cm(2)) or AbsorbaTack (8.7 N/cm(2)) groups. In contrast, the mesh could be fixed with the I-Clip only in 56% of the cases, and then achieved rather poor retention strength. Adhesion was significantly greater in the ProTack group than in any of the other groups (p < 0.001). At 2 months, scanning electron microscopy showed only marginal degradation of the absorbable elements.

Conclusions: Suture fixation led to satisfactory attachment of the prosthesis. Additional widespread anchorage of the mesh was achieved with ProTack or AbsorbaTack. The feasibility and retention strength of the I-Clip were poor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Nov;207(5):663-9 - PubMed
    1. Surg Today. 2004;34(10):860-4 - PubMed
    1. Hernia. 2009 Apr;13(2):167-72 - PubMed
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;85(1):91-103, ix - PubMed
    1. Hernia. 2009 Apr;13(2):173-82 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources