Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Aug;39(4):345-74.
doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9139-x.

Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution

Affiliations

Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution

Gayle Dede. J Psycholinguist Res. 2010 Aug.

Abstract

Two self paced listening experiments examined the role of prosodic phrasing in syntactic ambiguity resolution. In Experiment 1, the stimuli consisted of early closure sentences (e.g., "While the parents watched, the child sang a song.") containing transitive-biased subordinate verbs paired with plausible direct objects or intransitive-biased subordinate verbs paired with implausible direct objects. Experiment 2 also contained early closure sentences with transitively and intransitive-biased subordinate verbs, but the subordinate verbs were always followed by plausible direct objects. In both experiments, there were two prosodic conditions. In the subject-biased prosodic condition, an intonational phrase boundary marked the clausal boundary following the subordinate verb. In the object-biased prosodic condition, the clause boundary was unmarked. The results indicate that lexical and prosodic cues interact at the subordinate verb and plausibility further affects processing at the ambiguous noun. Results are discussed with respect to models of the role of prosody in sentence comprehension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Examples of prosodic conditions: spectrogram and fundamental frequency.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
On-line listening times in critical segments in Experiment 1. Error bars indicate one standard error above the mean
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Experiment 2 listening times for critical segments. Error bars indicate one standard error above the mean

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams BC, Clifton C, Mitchell DC. Lexical guidance in sentence processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1998;5:265–270. - PubMed
    1. Blodgett A. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbus: The Ohio State University; 2004. The interaction of prosodic phrasing, verb bias, and plausibility during spoken sentence comprehension.
    1. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 4.6.12) [Computer software] 2007. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
    1. Boland JE. The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1997;12:423–484.
    1. Caplan D, Waters GS. On-line syntactic processing in aphasia: Studies with auditory moving windows presentation. Brain and Language. 2003;84:222–249. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources