Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal
- PMID: 20035172
- DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c6e199
Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal
Abstract
Objectives: Ankle fractures with a syndesmotic injury have historically been treated with syndesmotic screw fixation. We compared range of motion and functional outcomes' scores to assess patient benefit from syndesmotic screw and plate removal.
Design: Level IV--case series.
Setting: Level I--trauma center.
Patients/participants: Twenty-five consecutive patients with unstable ankle fractures and syndesmotic injury confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging.
Intervention: Locked syndesmotic screws and plates were removed; functional outcomes and range of motion were measured before and after screw removal.
Main outcome measurements: Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Olerud and Molander Ankle Score, and physical examination
Results: There was a significant improvement in range of motion, Foot and Ankle Outcome, and Olerud and Molander Ankle scores at the immediate postoperative visit. This was not significantly changed at longer follow-up. There were no adverse events or complications in these patients. No patient had radiographic loss of syndesmotic reduction after screw removal.
Conclusions: Locked screw and plate removal improved function both subjectively and objectively. Transsyndesmotic implant removal seems to assist improvements in the speed of rehabilitation.
Similar articles
-
No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures.J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Jan;24(1):17-23. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181bedca1. J Orthop Trauma. 2010. PMID: 20035173 Clinical Trial.
-
Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries--should the screw be removed before weight bearing?Injury. 2006 Sep;37(9):891-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.003. Epub 2006 Apr 19. Injury. 2006. PMID: 16630621
-
Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: a clinical evaluation.J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Oct;21(9):643-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318157a63a. J Orthop Trauma. 2007. PMID: 17921840
-
Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: review of current concepts.Injury. 2008 Apr;39(4):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.425. Epub 2008 Mar 7. Injury. 2008. PMID: 18316086 Review.
-
[Injuries of the inferior tibiofibular syndesmosis].Unfallchirurg. 2000 Jul;103(7):520-32. Unfallchirurg. 2000. PMID: 10969538 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Functional outcome of routine versus on-demand removal of the syndesmotic screw.Bone Jt Open. 2023 Dec 18;4(12):957-963. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.412.BJO-2023-0061. Bone Jt Open. 2023. PMID: 38108322 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of unstable ankle fracture (type Weber C), osteosynthesis and syndesmotic transfixation on position of fibula in tibiofibular notch: a cadaveric study.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):1445-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00068-021-01721-0. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022. PMID: 34137911
-
Meta-analysis of elastic versus rigid fixation in the treatment of acute tibiofibular syndesmosis injury.Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 2;13(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02448-2. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38303073 Free PMC article.
-
To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Jul;131(7):879-83. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1225-x. Epub 2010 Dec 16. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011. PMID: 21161662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Elective removal vs. retaining of hardware after osteosynthesis in asymptomatic patients-a scoping review.Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 2;9(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01488-2. Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33008477 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical