Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Jun;17(3):450-8.
doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9186-6. Epub 2009 Dec 25.

Interassay reproducibility of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT in patients with atrial fibrillation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Interassay reproducibility of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT in patients with atrial fibrillation

Santiago Aguadé-Bruix et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess interassay reproducibility of myocardial perfusion gated-SPECT for calculation of end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: One hundred and fifteen consecutive patients with AF from three participating hospitals (mean age 68.9 years, 39 women) were included in the study. All patients underwent two image gated acquisitions at rest with a 30 minute interval between them. Quantitative data were obtained using the QGS and ECT software algorithms.

Results: Heart rate was similar in both studies: 74.94 +/- 15.2 vs 73.03 +/- 15.57. QGS yielded an LVEF of 54.4%/53.8%, an EDV of 100 mL/101.5 mL, and an ESV of 51 mL/52.3 mL; and ECT showed an LVEF of 63.6%/62.9%, an EDV of 125.8 mL/127.4 mL and ESV of 54.1 mL/56.3 mL. Correlation between the two acquisitions was high (>0.948) for both methods for LVEF, EDV and ESV. Regression and Bland-Altman graphics showed a good agreement between all parameters. Interassay variation coefficients for each method (QGS/ECT) were 5.29% vs 4.83% for LVEF, 4.94% vs 5.17% for EDV, and 9.94% vs 12.78% for ESV.

Conclusions: Interassay reproducibility of LVEF and EDV with gated-SPECT in patients with AF is good, whereas for ESV it is suboptimal, particularly when ESV is small.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Nucl Med. 1999 Jun;40(6):924-34 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 1981 Mar;22(3):226-31 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006 Nov;13(6):855-66 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004 Dec;31(12):1606-13 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):e39-60 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources