Identification of spermatozoa in archived testicular cancer specimens: implications for bench side sperm retrieval at orchiectomy
- PMID: 20035981
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.039
Identification of spermatozoa in archived testicular cancer specimens: implications for bench side sperm retrieval at orchiectomy
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the patterns of spermatogenesis in the normal testicular parenchyma of primary testicular cancers and estimate the feasibility of sperm retrieval at the time of radical orchiectomy.
Methods: We reviewed the archived histologic sections of 39 consecutive patients who had undergone radical orchiectomy for primary testicular cancer at 3 university-affiliated hospitals. We examined all areas of normal (noncancerous) testicular parenchyma to evaluate the level of spermatogenesis and presence of mature spermatozoa in these sections. A minimum of 100 seminiferous tubules were scored per case. We also evaluated the epididymal tubules for the presence of mature spermatozoa. A review of the clinical chart was performed to evaluate the relationship between clinical data and histologic findings.
Results: In nearly 40% of the cases evaluated (15/38), the predominant histologic pattern was full spermatogenesis. Mature spermatozoa were identified in nearly 80% (30/38) of the testicular histologic sections and in 50% (14/28) of the evaluable epididymal sections. Clinical stage (presence of extranodal disease) and tumor marker levels were related to the probability of identifying mature spermatozoa in the testis.
Conclusions: The data suggest that sperm retrieval at the time of radical orchiectomy is a feasible fertility option, with a 40% probability of recovering spermatozoa by random biopsy of the noncancerous testicular parenchyma and an 80% probability of recovering spermatozoa with a more extensive dissection. In 50% men, spermatozoa may be recovered by epididymal aspiration alone.
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Predictors of spermatogenesis in radical orchiectomy specimen and potential implications for patients with testicular cancer.Fertil Steril. 2016 Jul;106(1):70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Mar 19. Fertil Steril. 2016. PMID: 27005273
-
Is ex vivo microdissection testicular sperm extraction indicated for infertile men undergoing radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer? Case report and literature review.Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):956-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.052. Epub 2014 Feb 12. Fertil Steril. 2014. PMID: 24529661 Review.
-
[Obstructive azoospermia in men who wish to father children; diagnosis and surgical sperm retrieval].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Dec 27;147(52):2583-7. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003. PMID: 14723027 Dutch.
-
Predictors of spermatogenesis in orchiectomy specimens.Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.038. Urology. 2013. PMID: 23374785
-
Therapeutic testis biopsy for sperm retrieval.Curr Opin Urol. 2007 Nov;17(6):431-8. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f0f0b1. Curr Opin Urol. 2007. PMID: 17921779 Review.
Cited by
-
Case report: remedial microdissection testicular sperm extraction after onco-microdissection testicular sperm extraction failure.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 23;103(8):e37201. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037201. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 38394502 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative semen quality is superior to the quality shortly after orchiectomy in patients with testicular germ cell tumour - a retrospective study from two centres in Germany.Basic Clin Androl. 2025 Feb 18;35(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12610-025-00252-7. Basic Clin Androl. 2025. PMID: 39966729 Free PMC article.
-
Microdissection testicular sperm extraction for men with nonobstructive azoospermia who have a testicular tumor in situ at the time of sperm retrieval.Asian J Androl. 2025 May 1;27(3):423-427. doi: 10.4103/aja2024109. Epub 2025 Feb 28. Asian J Androl. 2025. PMID: 40019188 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical