Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Apr;81(4):434-8.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.4.434.

Regular source of ambulatory care and access to health services

Affiliations

Regular source of ambulatory care and access to health services

R A Hayward et al. Am J Public Health. 1991 Apr.

Erratum in

  • Am J Public Health 1991 Jul;81(7):838

Abstract

Background: To examine why people lack a regular source of ambulatory care (RSAC) and explore whether this commonly used access measure accurately identifies population subgroups at risk for barriers to continuity care.

Methods: Using data from a 1986 national telephone survey, we performed a content analysis of subjects' verbatim reports as to why they lacked an RSAC (n = 5,748).

Results: The 16.4 percent of respondents who lacked an RSAC gave the following reasons: 1) financial problems, 8 percent; 2) local resource inaccessibility, 5 percent; 3) not wanting a regular source of ambulatory care, 61 percent; and 4) transitory loss of their regular source of ambulatory care, 18 percent. However, some sociodemographic subgroups reported substantially more problems with access barriers, and these disparities were often not detected by the global measure, RSAC. The poor were not more likely than the non-poor to lack an RSAC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.8; 95% confidence interval, [0.6, 1.1]), but were much more likely to lack an RSAC for financial reasons (OR = 5.2 [2.6, 10.6]). Similarly, rural respondents were not more likely than urban dwellers to lack an RSAC, but were more likely to lack an RSAC because of local resource inaccessibility (OR = 5.8 [2.8, 11.9]).

Conclusions: We conclude that the global measure, RSAC, is not an accurate indicator of whether population subgroups have access barriers to obtaining a source of continuity care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1981;2:159-82 - PubMed
    1. Am J Public Health. 1984 Dec;74(12):1331-9 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jul 4;313(1):44-7 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jul 4;313(1):59-63 - PubMed
    1. Med Care. 1986 Feb;24(2):97-112 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources