Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Apr;81(4):458-61.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.81.4.458.

Caffeine consumption during pregnancy and fetal growth

Affiliations

Caffeine consumption during pregnancy and fetal growth

L Fenster et al. Am J Public Health. 1991 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between maternal caffeine consumption and low birthweight, intrauterine growth retardation, and prematurity, adjusting for multiple confounders.

Methods: Data obtained from birth certificates and interviews on 1,230 women with singleton live births were analyzed to evaluate the potential influence of caffeine consumption during the first trimester on fetal growth.

Results: The crude odds ratio for intrauterine growth retardation in infants of women reporting heavy caffeine consumption (greater than 300 mg/day) was 3.86 (95% CI = 1.80, 8.40) which decreased to 2.90 (95% CI = 1.23, 6.87) after controlling for confounding factors. The adjusted odds ratio for low birthweight and heavy maternal caffeine consumption was also elevated (OR = 2.05; 95% CI = 0.86, 4.88). Women who reduced their caffeine intake from greater than 300 mg/day to less than that early in pregnancy had lower risks of delivering infants with either intrauterine growth retardation or low birthweight than women who continued to consume that amount. Preterm delivery appeared to be unrelated to caffeine consumption.

Conclusions: Taken together with studies reporting similar findings, these results suggest that heavy caffeine consumption increases the risk for fetal growth retardation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 May;59(5):624-32 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jun 24;306(25):1548-50 - PubMed
    1. Early Hum Dev. 1982 Dec 6;7(3):239-50 - PubMed
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Dec 15;147(8):939-42 - PubMed
    1. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1985 Jan-Feb;7(1):9-17 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources