Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan 1;2(2):392-8.
doi: 10.2741/e99.

Epac, not PKA catalytic subunit, is required for 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation

Affiliations

Epac, not PKA catalytic subunit, is required for 3T3-L1 preadipocyte differentiation

Zhenyu Ji et al. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). .

Abstract

Cyclic AMP plays a critical role in adipocyte differentiation and maturation. However, it is not clear which of the two intracellular cAMP receptors, exchange protein directly activated by cAMP/cAMP-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor or protein kinase A/cAMP-dependent protein kinase, is essential for cAMP-mediated adipocyte differentiation. In this study, we utilized a well-defined adipose differentiation model system, the murine preadipocyte line 3T3-L1, to address this issue. We showed that knocking down Epac expression in 3T3-L1 cells using lentiviral based small hairpin RNAs down-regulated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma expression and dramatically inhibited adipogenic conversion of 3T3-L1 cells while inhibiting PKA catalytic subunit activity by two mechanistically distinct inhibitors, heat stable protein kinase inhibitor and H89, had no effect on 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation. Moreover, cAMP analog selectively activating Epac was not able to stimulate adipogenic conversion. Our study demonstrated that while PKA catalytic activity is dispensable, activation of Epac is necessary but not sufficient for adipogenic conversion of 3T3-L1 cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PKA catalytic activity is not required for the differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. 3T3-L1 cells, two days post-confluence, were treated with various reagents as described below and induced to differentiate. Effects of treatments were documented either by cell imaging using a digital camera under a phase-contrast microscope (A) or by monitoring the cellular glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (B). Treatments include: 1, vehicles only; 2, 1 μM insulin and 1 μM Dex; 3, 1 μM insulin, 1 μM Dex, and 0.5 mM IBMX; 4, 1 μM insulin, 1 μM Dex, 0.5 mM IBMX and 5 μM H-89; and 5, 1 μM insulin, 1 μM Dex, 0.5 mM IBMX and 50 μM mPKI.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Epac1 expression is required for 3T3-L1 adipogenic differentiation. (A) mRNA expression levels of Epac1 after lentiviral shRNA silencing as measured by RT-PCR. (B) Protein levels of Epac1 after lentiviral shRNA silencing as measured by Western blot. (C) Effects of Epac1 gene silencing by lentiviral shRNAs on adipocyte differentiation efficiency of 3T3-L1 cells as determined by Oil Red O staining. NTC: non-targeting control shRNA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Silencing of Epac1 expression suppresses PPARγ expression in 3T3-L1 cells. Confluent 3T3-L1 cells treated with or without Epac1-specific or non-targeting control lentiviral shRNAs were incubated with 1 μM insulin, 1 μM Dex, and 0.5 mM IBMX (induced) or vehicle (uninduced) for two days. Total RNAs were then isolated and the levels of PPARγ expression were measured by real time PCR.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Activation of Epac is not sufficient for cAMP-stimulated differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. 3T3-L1 cells, two days post-confluent, were treated with various reagents as described below and induced to differentiate. Effects of treatments were documented either by cell imaging using a digital camera under a phase-contrast microscope (A) or by monitoring the cellular glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (B). Treatments include: 1, vehicles only; 2, 1 μM insulin and 1 μM Dex; 3, 1 μM insulin, 1 μM Dex, and 0.5 mM IBMX; and 4 and 5, 1 μM insulin, 1 μM Dex, and 100 or 200 μM 8-pCPT-2’-O-Me-cAMP, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cowherd RM, Lyle RE, McGehee RE., Jr Molecular regulation of adipocyte differentiation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999;10:3–10. - PubMed
    1. Green H, Meuth M. An established pre-adipose cell line and its differentiation in culture. Cell. 1974;3:127–133. - PubMed
    1. Gregoire FM, Smas CM, Sul HS. Understanding adipocyte differentiation. Physiol Rev. 1998;78:783–809. - PubMed
    1. Green H, Kehinde O. An established preadipose cell line and its differentiation in culture. II. Factors affecting the adipose conversion. Cell. 1975;5:19–27. - PubMed
    1. Cao Z, Umek RM, McKnight SL. Regulated expression of three C/EBP isoforms during adipose conversion of 3T3-L1 cells. Genes Dev. 1991;5:1538–1552. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources