Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization
- PMID: 20037008
- DOI: 10.1080/00222899709603468
Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization
Abstract
In two experiments, the effect of feedback delay on synchronization performance was examined. In Experiment 1, whether feedback delay has an effect on the asynchrony between tap and click was investigated, and a transfer effect between conditions, observed in a preliminary experiment, was studied. Experiment 2 served as a control experiment that assured that the effects were not caused by order effects. A linear relationship between the size of the delay and the asynchrony between tap and click was observed; that is, with increasing delay, the size of the asynchrony increased as well. The results support an extended version of the Paillard-Fraisse hypothesis that accounts for the results observed in synchronization tasks in which more than a single source of feedback from the tap is available. The results indicate that all tap-related information is integrated into a joint event code representing that tap at a central level. These codes are superimposed on click-related codes and are therefore responsible for the observed asynchronies. Moreover, the results suggest that tap-related codes arise from a linear combination of their tactile-kinesthetic and auditory components.
Similar articles
-
Synchronizing actions with events: the role of sensory information.Percept Psychophys. 1995 Apr;57(3):305-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03213056. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 7770322
-
Sensorimotor synchronization: the impact of temporally displaced auditory feedback.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):29-44. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(99)00052-9. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000. PMID: 10769938
-
Stop signals delay synchrony more for finger tapping than vocalization: a dual modality study of rhythmic synchronization in the stop signal task.PeerJ. 2018 Jul 12;6:e5242. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5242. eCollection 2018. PeerJ. 2018. PMID: 30013856 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal control of movements in sensorimotor synchronization.Brain Cogn. 2002 Feb;48(1):66-79. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1304. Brain Cogn. 2002. PMID: 11812033
-
Synchronization in repetitive smooth movement requires perceptible events.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Mar;136(3):432-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.011. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011. PMID: 21300324
Cited by
-
Timing of bimanual movements and deafferentation: implications for the role of sensory movement effects.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Sep;158(1):50-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1870-9. Epub 2004 Mar 9. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 15007586
-
A neuromechanistic model for rhythmic beat generation.PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 May 9;15(5):e1006450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006450. eCollection 2019 May. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019. PMID: 31071078 Free PMC article.
-
Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):464-86. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0670-0. Epub 2015 May 9. Psychol Res. 2016. PMID: 25957279
-
Spatiotemporal perturbations in paced finger tapping suggest a common mechanism for the processing of time errors.Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 28;9(1):17814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54133-x. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31780695 Free PMC article.
-
Subtle Patterns of Altered Responsiveness to Delayed Auditory Feedback during Finger Tapping in People Who Stutter.Brain Sci. 2024 May 7;14(5):472. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050472. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 38790451 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous