Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative
- PMID: 20038867
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c91180
Revision rates following primary adult spinal deformity surgery: six hundred forty-three consecutive patients followed-up to twenty-two years postoperative
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective study.
Objective: To analyze the prevalence of and reasons for unanticipated revision surgery in an adult spinal deformity population treated at one institution.
Summary of background data: No recent studies exist that analyze the rate or reason for unanticipated revision surgery for adult spinal deformity patients over a long period.
Methods: All patients presenting for primary instrumented spinal fusion with a diagnosis of adult deformity at a single institution from 1985 to 2008 were reviewed using a prospectively acquired database. All surgical patients with instrumented fusion of > or =5 levels using hooks, hybrid, or screw-only constructs were identified. Patient charts and radiographs were reviewed to provide information as to the indication for initial and any subsequent reoperation. A total of 643 patients underwent primary instrumented fusion for a diagnosis of adult idiopathic scoliosis (n = 432), de novo degenerative scoliosis (n = 104), adult kyphotic disease (n = 63), or neuromuscular scoliosis (n = 45). The mean age was 37.9 years (range, 18-84). Mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.7 years, and 8.2 years for the subset of the cohort requiring reoperation (range, 1 month-22.3 years).
Results: A total of 58 of 643 patients (9.0%) underwent at least one revision surgery and 15 of 643 (2.3%) had more than one revision (mean 1.3; range, 1-3). The mean time to the first revision was 4.0 years (range, 1 week-19.7 years). The most common reasons for revision were pseudarthrosis (24/643 = 3.7%; 24/58 = 41.4%), curve progression (13/643 = 2.0%; 13/58 = 20.7%), infection (9/643 = 1.4%; 9/58 = 15.5%), and painful/prominent implants (4/643 = 0.6%; 4/58 = 6.9%). Uncommon reasons consisted of adjacent segment degeneration (3), implant failure (3), neurologic deficit (1), and coronal imbalance (1). Revision rates over the follow-up period were: 0 to 2 years (26/58 = 44.8%), 2 to 5 years (17/58 = 29.3%), 5 to 10 years (7/58 = 12.1%), >10 years (8/58 = 13.8%).
Conclusion: Repeat surgical intervention following definitive spinal instrumented fusion for primary adult deformity performed at a single institution demonstrated a relatively low rate of 9.0%. The most common reasons for revision were predictable and included pseudarthrosis, proximal or distal curve progression, and infection.
Similar articles
-
Reoperation after primary fusion for adult spinal deformity: rate, reason, and timing.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):832-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819f2080. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19365253
-
Revision surgery after primary spine fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2191-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b3515a. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. PMID: 19752705
-
Repeat surgical interventions following "definitive" instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):3018-26. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000249553.22138.58. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006. PMID: 17172999
-
Fate of the adult revision spinal deformity patient: a single institution experience.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 1;38(19):E1196-200. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829e764b. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23759813 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The problems and limitations of applying evidence-based medicine to primary surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19 Suppl):S135-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181453e22. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007. PMID: 17728681 Review.
Cited by
-
Demineralized cortical fibers are associated with a low pseudarthrosis rate in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity without three-column osteotomy.Brain Spine. 2023 May 10;3:101751. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2023.101751. eCollection 2023. Brain Spine. 2023. PMID: 37383466 Free PMC article.
-
Risk of revision surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis: a survival analysis of 517 cases over 25 years.Eur Spine J. 2016 Aug;25(8):2527-34. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4505-5. Epub 2016 Mar 10. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 26964785
-
Lack of improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores 6 months after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) predicts high revision rate in the second postoperative year.Eur Spine J. 2017 Aug;26(8):2160-2166. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5068-9. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28361369
-
Effectiveness of Short-Segment Fixation versus Long-Segment Fixation for Degenerative Scoliosis with Cobb Angle 20°~40°: A Retrospective Observational Study.Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jul 22;26:e923656. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923656. Med Sci Monit. 2020. PMID: 32694499 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis of Primary and Revision Single-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgeries: Predictors, Outcomes, and Clinical Implications Using Big Data.J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 23;14(3):723. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030723. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 39941393 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials