Standard chemoradiation versus intensity-modulated chemoradiation: a quality of life assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients
- PMID: 20039175
- PMCID: PMC2874032
- DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1183-5
Standard chemoradiation versus intensity-modulated chemoradiation: a quality of life assessment in oropharyngeal cancer patients
Abstract
This study is based on the context that many patients with advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma are being treated with primary chemoradiation. The aims of this study are to identify differences in quality of life (QOL) between patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer following traditional chemoradiation versus chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (CIMRT). This research is designed on a cohort study from an academic tertiary referral center. Fifty patients were identified from an institutional database of patients who had undergone primary chemotherapy and radiation (traditional or IMRT) for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Patients responded via mail using the University of Washington quality of life instrument version 4. Statistical analysis of data was performed using Chi-square and Wilcoxon tests. The results comprise the responses of 17 CRT (57%) and 14 CIMRT (70%) patients. The patients completed the survey between 9 and 44 months following end of treatment. When adjusted for tumor stage and time since treatment, CIMRT patients reported improved appearance (p = 0.05), chewing (p = 0.02), and mood (p = 0.01). There was a trend toward significance for improved activity (p = 0.07), recreation (p = 0.07), and anxiety (p = 0.08). There were no differences between the two groups for saliva, taste, shoulder function, speech, and swallowing. But there was a trend for significance for improved overall QOL in patients who had undergone CIMRT (p = 0.06). In conclusion, CIMRT results in improved QOL for some domains but surprisingly not for swallowing or saliva. Patients undergoing CIMRT also report slightly better QOL overall when compared to patients receiving more traditional forms of radiation therapy.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer: a structured review of the literature.Support Care Cancer. 2018 Aug;26(8):2511-2518. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4227-9. Epub 2018 May 3. Support Care Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29725802 Review.
-
Quality of life outcomes in laryngeal and oropharyngeal cancer patients after chemoradiation.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Oct;135(4):565-70. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.06.1266. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006. PMID: 17011418
-
Quality of life in advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma after chemoradiation versus surgery and radiation.Laryngoscope. 2006 Sep;116(9):1589-93. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000233244.18901.44. Laryngoscope. 2006. PMID: 16954985
-
Quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Feb;140(2):129-33. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5988. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014. PMID: 24337483
-
Correlation between plan quality improvements and reduced acute dysphagia and xerostomia in the definitive treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Head Neck. 2019 Apr;41(4):1096-1103. doi: 10.1002/hed.25594. Epub 2019 Jan 31. Head Neck. 2019. PMID: 30702180 Review.
Cited by
-
Neighborhood deprivation and clinical outcomes among head and neck cancer patients.Health Place. 2012 Jul;18(4):861-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Health Place. 2012. PMID: 22445028 Free PMC article.
-
Two-year results of a prospective preventive swallowing rehabilitation trial in patients treated with chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 May;271(5):1257-70. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2640-8. Epub 2013 Jul 28. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014. PMID: 23892729 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of swallowing function after intensity-modulated radiation therapy and conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.Head Neck. 2015 Nov;37(11):1575-82. doi: 10.1002/hed.23796. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Head Neck. 2015. PMID: 24909649 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective clinical study on long-term swallowing function and voice quality in advanced head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and preventive swallowing exercises.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3521-31. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3379-6. Epub 2014 Nov 8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25381096 Clinical Trial.
-
Quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer: a structured review of the literature.Support Care Cancer. 2018 Aug;26(8):2511-2518. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4227-9. Epub 2018 May 3. Support Care Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29725802 Review.
References
-
- Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. The Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group (1991) N Eng J Med 324(24):1685–1690 - PubMed
-
- Machtay M, Rosenthal DI, Hershock D, Jones H, Williamson S, Greenberg MJ, et al. Organ preservation therapy using induction plus concurrent chemoradiation for advanced resectable oropharyngeal carcinoma: a University of Pennsylvania phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(19):3964–3971. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.11.026. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Münter MW, Hoffner S, Hof H, Herfarth KK, Haberkorn U, Rudat V, et al. Changes in salivary gland function after radiotherapy of head and neck tumors measured by quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy: comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional radiation therapy with and without Amifostine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(3):651–659. - PubMed
-
- Lee NY, de Arrudo FF, Puri DR, Wolden SL, Narayana A, Mechaloakos J. A comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and concomitant boost radiotherapy in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(4):966–974. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials