Peer mentoring in doctor performance assessment: strategies, obstacles and benefits
- PMID: 20040054
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03580.x
Peer mentoring in doctor performance assessment: strategies, obstacles and benefits
Abstract
Context: Mentors are increasingly involved in doctor performance assessments. Mentoring seems to be a key determinant in achieving the ultimate goal of those assessments, namely, improving doctor performance. Little is known, however, about how mentors perceive and fulfil this role.
Objective: The aim of this paper is to expand understanding of the role of mentors in performance assessment.
Methods: Thirty-eight mentors undertook formative performance assessments of their peers in a pilot study. A mixed-methods design was used, consisting of a postal survey (n = 28) and qualitative interviews with a subset of mentors (n = 11). Individual semi-structured interviews were completed and transcripts were analysed by two researchers using a grounded theory approach.
Results: The results of the survey showed that 89% of mentors intended to continue in their mentorship role. Interviews revealed that mentors used several strategies in the assessments, including: contrasting and collating information; posing reflective questions, and goal setting. Mentors experienced difficulty in disregarding their views of the doctors evaluated. Some mentors noticed obstacles with specific interview skills such as 'paying attention to their colleagues' strengths' and 'enabling doctors to find their own solutions'. Mentors reported that they and their organisations benefited from the assessments. The perceived benefits included: improved interview skills; increased solidarity, and increased mutual respect.
Conclusions: The study provides insights into what mentors can do to increase the chance that externally derived information is integrated into doctors' self-assessments. Mainly, mentors used strategies aimed at effectively delivering feedback and encouraging reflection. However, we found that mentors who took part in our study appeared to struggle with a number of obstacles related to: time investment; familiarity with the doctor assessed, and the acquiring of specific interview skills.
Similar articles
-
Mentorship in contemporary practice: the experiences of nursing students and practice mentors.J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jul;17(14):1834-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02233.x. J Clin Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18578757
-
Doctors' perceptions of why 360-degree feedback does (not) work: a qualitative study.Med Educ. 2009 Sep;43(9):874-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03439.x. Med Educ. 2009. PMID: 19709012
-
Supporting students' learning and professional development through the process of continuous assessment and mentorship.Nurse Educ Today. 2000 Aug;20(6):463-74. doi: 10.1054/nedt.2000.0458. Nurse Educ Today. 2000. PMID: 10959135
-
Subjectivity and the valid assessment of pre-registration student nurse clinical learning outcomes: implications for mentors.Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Jan;29(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.006. Epub 2008 Aug 15. Nurse Educ Today. 2009. PMID: 18707802 Review.
-
Foundation doctors' experience and views of mentoring.Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2013 Dec;74(12):682-6. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2013.74.12.682. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2013. PMID: 24326715 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Reflection revisited: how physicians conceptualize and experience reflection in professional practice - a qualitative study.BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 11;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1218-y. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29747630 Free PMC article.
-
Development and Evaluation of an Audit and Feedback Process for Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury During Coronary Angiography and Intervention.CJC Open. 2021 Oct 23;4(3):271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.10.006. eCollection 2022 Mar. CJC Open. 2021. PMID: 35386131 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Clinical Decision Support With Audit and Feedback on Prevention of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2022 Sep 6;328(9):839-849. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13382. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 36066520 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Peer-assisted debriefing of multisource feedback: an exploratory qualitative study.BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 14;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1137-y. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29540204 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple-role mentoring: mentors' conceptualisations, enactments and role conflicts.Med Educ. 2019 Jun;53(6):605-615. doi: 10.1111/medu.13811. Epub 2019 Feb 5. Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 30723949 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources