Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;33(1):29-34.
doi: 10.4103/0971-6203.39422.

Pediatric radiography entrance doses for some routine procedures in three hospitals within eastern Nigeria

Affiliations

Pediatric radiography entrance doses for some routine procedures in three hospitals within eastern Nigeria

N O Egbe et al. J Med Phys. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

A survey of the entrance surface doses in the routine radiography of children in eastern Nigeria has been carried out in three hospitals, using thermoluminescence detectors. Chest, abdomen, lumbar spine, skull and pelvis were covered in this study. Findings reveal that doses are higher than the recommended reference values elsewhere, as well as values reported for Sudan. The mean percentage difference in entrance doses for chest radiography for this study and an earlier one carried out for three hospitals in the west of Nigeria is about 44.7%. The high doses are traceable to a lack of standardization in procedure, resulting in use of low tube voltages and high currents for examination, as well as the status of facilities in the area. Recommendations are made for immediate corrective measures to lower the doses.

Keywords: Entrance surface dose; exposure; kilovoltage; pediatric; radiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of mean ESDs for the three hospitals, for chest, abdomen and skull in this work (TW) with data from three other hospitals in Nigeria from the study by Ogundare et al.,[19] and from UNSCEAR.[20] The age range 0-1 month was merged with 1 month - 1 year for this comparison. The values plotted in the figure are therefore mean values for the two age groups (0-1 month and 1 month - 1 year) in the references[19] and,[20] respectively.

Similar articles

References

    1. International Commission for Radiological Protection, 1990. Recommendations of the ICRP on Radiological Protection, Publication 60. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press; 1991.
    1. Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine. International Commission for Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 73. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press; 1996.
    1. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency. Safety Series, No. 115. Vienna: IAEA; 1996. International Labour Organisation, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, PAN American Health Organisation, WHO: International Basic Safety Standards for Protection against Ionizing Radiation and for the safety of Radiation sources.
    1. National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) Document of the NRPB, No. 3. Vol 1. Chilton: NRPB; 1990. ‘Patient Dose reduction in diagnostic Radiology’.
    1. National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB) Guidelines on Patient Dose to promote the Optimization of Protection for Diagnostic Medical Exposures. 1999;10:1.