Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec 30;4(12):e8517.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008517.

Within-subject variability of interferon-g assay results for tuberculosis and boosting effect of tuberculin skin testing: a systematic review

Affiliations

Within-subject variability of interferon-g assay results for tuberculosis and boosting effect of tuberculin skin testing: a systematic review

Richard N van Zyl-Smit et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Variability in interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) results for tuberculosis has implications for interpretation of results close to the cut-point, and for defining thresholds for test conversion and reversion. However, little is known about the within-subject variability (reproducibility) of IGRAs. Several national guidelines recommend a two-step testing procedure (tuberculin skin test [TST] followed by IGRA) for the diagnosis of LTBI. However, the effect of a preceding TST on subsequent IGRA results has been reported in studies with apparently conflicting results.

Methodology/findings: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize evidence on within-subject variability of IGRA results and the potential boosting effect of TST. We searched several databases and reviewed citations of previous reviews on IGRAs. We included studies using commercial IGRAs, in addition to non-commercial versions of the ELISPOT assay. Four studies, fulfilling our predefined criteria, examined within-subject variability and 13 studies evaluated TST effects on subsequent IGRA responses. Meta-analysis was not considered appropriate because of heterogeneity in study methods, assays, and populations. Although based on limited data, within-subject variability was present in all studies but the magnitude varied (16-80%) across studies. A TST induced "boosting" of IGRA responses was demonstrated in several studies and although more pronounced in IGRA-positive (i.e. sensitized) individuals, also occurred in a smaller but not insignificant proportion of IGRA-negative subjects. The TST appeared to affect IGRA responses only after 3 days and may apparently persist for several months, but evidence for this is weak.

Conclusions/significance: Although reproducibility data are scarce, significant within person IGRA variability has been reported. If confirmed in more studies, this has implications for the interpretation of results close to the cut-point and for definition of conversions and reversions. Although the effect of TST on IGRA results is likely to be inconsequential in IGRA-positive subjects, in IGRA-negative subjects, the interpretation of results may be confounded by a preceding TST if administered more than 3 days prior to an IGRA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: MP serves as an external consultant for the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnotics (FIND), a non-profit agency that works with several industry partners for developing and evaluating new diagnostics for TB and other neglected infections. He also serves at the Co-Chair of the Stop TB Partnership's New Diagnostics Working Group. Madhukar Pai is the Section Editor for TB with PLoS One and Editorial Board member with PLoS Medicine.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study selection flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic of the concept of “conversion and reversion” and “within-subject variability”.
The conversion and reversion points depicted are based on the manufacture's definitions with a hypothetical within-subject variability or borderline/grey zone indicated. The shaded area for the T-SPOT.TB diagram is the FDA defined grey zone.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Farhat M, Greenaway C, Pai M, Menzies D. False-positive tuberculin skin tests: what is the absolute effect of BCG and non-tuberculous mycobacteria? Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006;10:1192–1204. - PubMed
    1. van Zyl-Smit RN, Pai M, Peprah K, Meldau R, Kieck J, et al. Within-subject Variability and Boosting of T Cell IFN-{gamma} Responses Following Tuberculin Skin Testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180:49–58. - PubMed
    1. Veerapathran A, Joshi R, Goswami K, Dogra S, Moodie EE, et al. T-cell assays for tuberculosis infection: deriving cut-offs for conversions using reproducibility data. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e1850. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Menzies D. Interpretation of repeated tuberculin tests. Boosting, conversion, and reversion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:15–21. - PubMed
    1. Pai M, Zwerling A, Menzies D. Systematic review: T-cell-based assays for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection: an update. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:177–184. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances