Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Feb 23;302(6774):449-51.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6774.449.

The domiciliary consultation service: time to take stock

Affiliations

The domiciliary consultation service: time to take stock

L J Donaldson et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To review the use of the domiciliary consultation service in modern clinical practice in the Northern region.

Design: Retrospective study of data on domiciliary consultations from claim forms for payment submitted to the regional health authority by consultants during 1984-5 and prospective study during 1985-9. Peer review of patterns of practice by consultants.

Setting: 15 Of the 16 health districts in the Northern region, comprising a mixed urban and rural population of about 2.8 million.

Participants: 760 Consultants in 28 specialties and 1666 general practitioners who were eligible to perform or request domiciliary consultations.

Main outcome measures: Numbers of domiciliary consultations, general practitioners' requests for consultations, and consultants performing consultations and expenditure on the service by the region.

Results: Use of the domiciliary consultation service in the Northern region declined by 53% between 1984-5 and 1988-9, considerably in excess of the national rate of decline of 27%, and expenditure on the service was reduced, after allowing for inflation, by 604,000 pounds, or 38%, in real terms. Most consultants and general practitioners used the service sparingly whereas a small proportion used it heavily; a few specific consultants and general practitioners were responsible for a relatively high rate of domiciliary consultations. Contrary to the original definition of domiciliary consultation, the general practitioner accompanied the consultant on only one occasion in 17 and, in one specialty examined (paediatrics) patients who received domiciliary consultations seemed to have minor medical problems.

Conclusions: Peer review examination of the pattern of practice in the domiciliary consultation service proved effective in rationalising use of the service, although a substantial minority of consultants and general practitioners continued to use the service heavily. The place of the service in modern clinical practice would benefit from a national review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Domiciliary visits.
    Forsythe M. Forsythe M. BMJ. 1991 Feb 23;302(6774):426-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6774.426. BMJ. 1991. PMID: 2004164 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Domiciliary visits.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] BMJ. 1991 Mar 16;302(6777):655-6. BMJ. 1991. PMID: 2012886 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Mar 5;286(6367):819-22 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 May 11;290(6479):1399-402 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1986 Jul;36(288):313-5 - PubMed
    1. Community Med. 1987 May;9(2):121-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 Feb 20;296(6621):515-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources