Macrosomia is the only reliable predictor of shoulder dystocia in babies weighing 3.5 kg or more
- PMID: 20042263
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.12.003
Macrosomia is the only reliable predictor of shoulder dystocia in babies weighing 3.5 kg or more
Abstract
Objective: To determine if shoulder dystocia can be predicted in babies born weighing 3.5 kg or more.
Study design: A case-control study nested in a perinatal database of 899 mothers and their babies who weighed 3.5 kg or more. All were term pregnancies and delivered vaginally. A case was defined as any baby that encountered shoulder dystocia at delivery. Controls were deliveries over the same period that were not complicated by shoulder dystocia. A logistic regression model was created with macrosomia, parity, previous delivery of more than 3.5 kg, diabetes in pregnancy, prolonged labor, prolonged second stage and instrumental delivery as the independent variables. The adjusted odds ratio and the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves were used to see if these variables, both individually and as a model, were associated with or were discriminative enough to predict shoulder dystocia; an ROC curve of more than 0.7 showing good prediction.
Results: There were 36 cases of shoulder dystocia during the study period, an incidence of 4%. Previous delivery of more than 3.5 kg, prolonged labor and prolonged second stage were not associated with shoulder dystocia. Although diabetes and instrumental delivery were independently and significantly associated with shoulder dystocia their importance as a predictor became relevant only in the presence of macrosomia.
Conclusion: Macrosomia is the only reliable predictor of shoulder dystocia.
Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Shoulder dystocia. A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 1978 Nov;52(5):526-9. Obstet Gynecol. 1978. PMID: 724169
-
Is abnormal labor associated with shoulder dystocia in nulliparous women?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;190(6):1604-7; discussion 1607-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.067. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. PMID: 15284748
-
Fetal macrosomia in African women: a study of 249 cases.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):857-61. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0780-7. Epub 2008 Nov 19. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009. PMID: 19018549
-
Shoulder dystocia: nursing prevention and posttrauma care.J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008 Jan-Mar;22(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/01.JPN.0000311870.07958.81. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18287897 Review.
-
Shoulder dystocia: etiology, common risk factors, and management.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005 Nov-Dec;50(6):485-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.07.005. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005. PMID: 16260363 Review.
Cited by
-
Three Days Compared to One Day Per Week of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Mild Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Trial.J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 29;11(13):3770. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133770. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35807057 Free PMC article.
-
Six-year incidence and some features of cases of brachial plexus injury in a tertiary referral center.Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;12(2):71-74. doi: 10.4274/tjod.80388. Epub 2015 Jun 15. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 28913046 Free PMC article.
-
Shoulder dystocia: an Evidence-Based approach.J Prenat Med. 2010 Jul;4(3):35-42. J Prenat Med. 2010. PMID: 22439059 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources