Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;176(2):575-84.
doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090442. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

Prognostic significance of Gremlin1 (GREM1) promoter CpG island hypermethylation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Affiliations

Prognostic significance of Gremlin1 (GREM1) promoter CpG island hypermethylation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Iris J H van Vlodrop et al. Am J Pathol. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Gremlin1 (GREM1), a bone morphogenetic protein antagonist and putative angiogenesis-modulating gene, is silenced by promoter hypermethylation in human malignancies. Here we study GREM1 methylation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and its impact on tumor characteristics and clinical outcome. Three GREM1 promoter CpG island regions (i, ii, iii) were analyzed by methylation-specific PCR and/or bisulfite sequencing in ccRCC cell lines and ccRCCs from two independent patient series. Results were correlated with clinicopathological and angiogenic parameters. Bisulfite sequencing of ccRCC cell lines showed GREM1 methylation, associated with absence of GREM1 mRNA. GREM1 methylation prevalence in ccRCCs varied between regions: 55%, 24%, and 20% for regions i, ii, and iii, respectively. GREM1 region iii methylation was associated with increased tumor size (P = 0.02), stage (P = 0.013), grade (P = 0.04), tumor (P = 0.001), and endothelial cell (P = 0.0001) proliferation and decreased mean vessel density (P = 0.001) in a hospital-based ccRCC series (n = 150). In univariate analysis, GREM1 region iii methylated ccRCCs had a significant worse survival when compared with unmethylated ccRCCs (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.29 to 4.28), but not in multivariate analysis (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.74). In a population-based validation series (n = 185), GREM1 region iii methylation was associated with increased Fuhrman grade (P = 0.03) and decreased overall survival (P = 0.001) in univariate and multivariate analysis (HR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.52 to 3.53 and HR = 2.27, 95% CI: 1.44 to 3.59, respectively). The strong correlation between GREM1 region iii promoter methylation and increased malignancy and its correlation with active angiogenesis indicates a role for GREM1 in ccRCC carcinogenesis and tumor angiogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GREM1 promoter CpG island, methylation analyses, and mRNA expression in ccRCC cell lines. GREM1 putative promoter CpG island relative to the transcription start site (TSS), including the locations of BSseq primer sets (i, ii, TSS, and iii; grey arrows: sequence primer locations) and MSP primer sets i, ii, and iii (underlined: flank PCR primer locations, black arrows: methylation specific PCR primer location, respectively) (A) with representive BSseq (B), MSP, asterisk represents clones for bisulfite sequencing of the cell lines SKRC1, SKRC10, SKRC52, and SKRC59 for region i, ii, TSS and iii. (C), and mRNA expression (D) results of ccRCC cell lines SKRC1, SKRC10, SKRC52, SKRC59. mRNA expression data resulted after three independent experiments. Open/closed squares indicate unmethylated/methylated CpGs. U indicates unmethylated product; M, methylated product; IVD, methylation positive control; HUV, methylation negative control; H2O(1), Flank PCR control without DNA; H2O(2), MSP control without DNA; DAC, 5′aza-2-deoxycytidine; TSA, Trichostatin A.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall cause-specific survival curves for ccRCC patients according to GREM1 promoter CpG island methylation at region i (A), ii (B), and iii (C and D), with A, B, and C for patients of the hospital-based series and D for patients of the population-based series.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prognostic significance of GREM1 promoter CpG island methylation in hospital-based and population-based ccRCC patient series.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kovacs G, Akhtar M, Beckwith BJ, Bugert P, Cooper CS, Delahunt B, Eble JN, Fleming S, Ljungberg B, Medeiros LJ, Moch H, Reuter VE, Ritz E, Roos G, Schmidt D, Srigley JR, Storkel S, van den Berg E, Zbar B. The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J Pathol. 1997;183:131–133. - PubMed
    1. Gelb AB. Renal cell carcinoma: current prognostic factors. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer. 1997;80:981–986. - PubMed
    1. Kaelin WG., Jr The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene and kidney cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:6290S–6295S. - PubMed
    1. van Dijk BA, Schouten LJ, Oosterwijk E, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Kiemeney LA, Goldbohm RA, Schalken JA, van den Brandt PA. Cigarette smoking, von Hippel-Lindau gene mutations and sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:374–377. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gnarra JR, Duan DR, Weng Y, Humphrey JS, Chen DY, Lee S, Pause A, Dudley CF, Latif F, Kuzmin I, Schmidt L, Duh FM, Stackhouse T, Chen F, Kishida T, Wei MH, Lerman MI, Zbar B, Klausner RD, Linehan WM. Molecular cloning of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene and its role in renal carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1242:201–210. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances