Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;21(3):411-20.
doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9473-1. Epub 2009 Dec 31.

Timeliness and follow-up patterns of cervical cancer detection in a cohort of medically underserved California women

Affiliations

Timeliness and follow-up patterns of cervical cancer detection in a cohort of medically underserved California women

Farzaneh Tabnak et al. Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: This study examines factors associated with timely follow-up after Pap test in a program providing cervical cancer detection services to medically underserved California women.

Methods: Data between 01 January 1992 and 30 June 2007 were analyzed. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify subgroups of women with delayed time to diagnosis or treatment scheduling. The probability of being scheduled for final diagnosis and treatment was assessed using logistic regression analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the women lost to follow up were examined.

Results: Time from screening to final diagnosis scheduling differed according to age group, race/ethnicity, and Pap test result. Race/ethnicity and age were associated with whether treatment was scheduled or not. While loss to follow up among those scheduled for final diagnosis was associated with certain patients' characteristics, no such association was found among those who were scheduled for treatment.

Conclusions: Patient's demographic characteristics determine the odds of being scheduled for final diagnosis and treatment as well as timeliness of follow-up from screening to final diagnosis. Findings suggest that the dual goal of reducing health disparities and cost-effective detection and treatment of precancerous disease to prevent cervical cancers cannot be achieved without consideration of racial/ethnic differences and needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about cervical cancer? (last revised: 05/13/2009. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/cri/content/cri_2_4_1x_what_are_the_key_st... Checked on August 07, 2009.
    1. Christopherson WM, Lundin FE, Mendez WM, Parker JE. Cervical cancer control: a study of morbidity and trends over a twenty-one year period. Cancer. 1976;38:1357–1366. - PubMed
    1. Clarke EA, Anderson TW. Does screening by “Pap” test help prevent cervical cancer? a case-control study. Lancet. 1979;2:1–4. - PubMed
    1. Boyes DA. The value of a Pap test program and suggestions for its implementation. Cancer. 1981;48(suppl):613–621. - PubMed
    1. Wright TC, Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. 2001;287:2120–2129. - PubMed

MeSH terms