Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction
- PMID: 20043768
- DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.SPINE09344
Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction
Abstract
Object: In this paper, the authors' goal was to elucidate the clinical features and results of decompression surgery for extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction.
Methods: Twenty-eight patients with severe leg pain caused by extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction (18 men and 10 women; mean age 68.2 +/- 8.9 years) were treated by posterior decompression without fusion using a microendoscope in 19 patients and a surgical microscope or loupe in 9 patients. The decompression procedures consisted of partial resection of the sacral ala, the L-5 transverse process, and the L5-S1 facet joint along the L-5 spinal nerve. The following items were investigated: 1) preoperative neurological findings; 2) preoperative radiological findings, including plain radiographs, CT scans, selective radiculography of L-5; 3) surgical outcome as evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale for low-back pain (JOA score); and 4) need for revision surgery.
Results: All patients presented with neurological deficits compatible with a diagnosis of L-5 radiculopathy such as weakness of the extensor hallucis longus muscle and sensory disturbance in the L-5 area together with neurogenic claudication. On plain radiographs, 21 patients (75%) and 17 patients (60.7%) exhibited lumbar scoliosis (>or= 5 degrees) and wedging of the L5-S1 intervertebral space (>or= 3 degrees), respectively. The CT scans demonstrated marked osteophyte formation at the posterolateral margin of the L5-S1 vertebral bodies, and a selective L-5 nerve root block was effective in all patients. All patients reported pain relief immediately after surgery. The mean JOA scores were 11.3 +/- 3.8 before surgery and 24.3 +/- 3.4 at the time of the final follow-up examination; the recovery rate was 68.6 +/- 16.5%. The mean estimated blood loss was 66.6 +/- 98.6 ml, and the mean surgical time was 135.3 +/- 46.5 minutes. No significant difference in the recovery rate of the JOA scores or in the surgical time and blood loss was observed between the 2 surgical approaches. Four patients underwent revision posterior interbody fusion for the recurrence of radicular pain as a result of intraforaminal stenosis in 3 patients and insufficient decompression of the extraforaminal area in the remaining patient at an average of 19.5 months after surgery.
Conclusions: Extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction is a rare but distinct pathological condition causing L-5 radiculopathy. Decompression surgery without fusion using a microendoscope or a surgical microscope/loupe is a feasible and less invasive surgical option for elderly patients with extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction.
Similar articles
-
Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine: anatomic study and a report of four cases.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 15;27(6):E169-73. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203150-00020. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. PMID: 11884922
-
Extraforaminal compression of the L-5 nerve root at the lumbosacral junction: clinical analysis, decompression technique, and outcome.J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Apr;20(4):371-9. doi: 10.3171/2013.12.SPINE12629. Epub 2014 Jan 24. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014. PMID: 24460578
-
Microsurgical midline approach for the decompression of extraforaminal stenosis in L5-S1.J Neurosurg. 2003 Apr;98(3 Suppl):264-70. doi: 10.3171/spi.2003.98.3.0264. J Neurosurg. 2003. PMID: 12691382
-
Minimally invasive far lateral microendoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal disc herniation at the lumbosacral junction: cadaveric dissection and technical case report.Spine J. 2007 Jul-Aug;7(4):414-21. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.008. Epub 2007 Jan 30. Spine J. 2007. PMID: 17630139 Review.
-
Iatrogenic neurologic deficit after lumbar spine surgery: A review.Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;139:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Sep 1. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015. PMID: 26386902 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-term Outcomes after Microsurgical Decompression of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis and Adverse Effects of Preoperative Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2021 Oct 15;61(10):598-606. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0159. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2021. PMID: 34408108 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Microscopic Lumbar Foraminal Decompression: A Pilot Analysis of Possible Risk Factors for Restenosis.Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Jan 15;58(1):49-58. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0121. Epub 2017 Nov 24. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018. PMID: 29176269 Free PMC article.
-
Microsurgical Foraminotomy via Wiltse Paraspinal Approach for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5-S1 Level : Risk Factor Analysis for Poor Outcome.J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Nov;59(6):610-614. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.610. Epub 2016 Oct 24. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016. PMID: 27847575 Free PMC article.
-
Risk Factors of Restenosis After Full Endoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Case-Control Study.Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):899-907. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346508.254. Epub 2023 Sep 30. Neurospine. 2023. PMID: 37798985 Free PMC article.
-
Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Various Foraminal Lesions at the Lumbosacral Lesion.Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):569-573. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.569. Epub 2018 Jun 4. Asian Spine J. 2018. PMID: 29879787 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources